+1 to separate.
> On Apr 25, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> +1 to separate, it makes sense to me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:50 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa
> <wa.moust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to make a proposal for issue [1] to support materialized views
>> in Iceberg. The support leverages two separate objects, an Iceberg view and
>> an Iceberg table to implement materialized views. Each object retains
>> relevant metadata to support the MV operations. An initial design, which we
>> can refine, is detailed in the description section of this PR [2].
>>
>> This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions in various
>> forums [3, 4, 5, 6, 7].
>>
>> Please respond with your recommendation:
>> +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model.
>> 0 if you are neutral.
>> -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Walaa.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10043
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9830
>> [3]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg0wQ5bVKTckf7-K_cdwF4mlRi6sixLcyEh6jErpGYY
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/6420
>> [5]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnhldHhe3Grz8JBngwXPA6ZZord1xMedY5ukEhZYF
>> [6] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tb3wcs7czjvjbq9y1qtr87g9s95ky5zh
>> [7] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l6cvrp4r1001k08cy2ypybzy2kgxpt1y
