Hi Dave, I think Ian's project should not be a problem since It's like the "Flex" name, it could be as well choose for someone to start a project and nobody could obligate him to change it. But "Apache Flex" is not the same, there will be trademarks problems. If not, the marketing world would collapse itself since I'm sure almost all names are chosen.
2017-09-14 0:30 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > Hi - > > I did a quick suitable name search. > > Royale might be taken by this individual’s project https://github.com/ > ian-culleton/royale > > Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly. > There is a lot of “Clash Royale" > > And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction to > what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. > > Regards, > Dave > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Hi - > > We have one alternative name - Royale > > Are there others that people would like to propose? > > If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > > Regards, > Dave > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Hi Om, > > I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. If we > want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more complicated > VOTE counting. > > Regards, > Dave > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We could always structure the VOTE like this: > > 1. Royale > 2. XXX > 3. YYY > 4. FlexJS > > One vote should answer both questions. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the > name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with > porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed name... > > Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still with > nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least one > day more before VOTE. > > Piotr > > > > 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > > +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. > > I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new > brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always > > state > > from where we have come and what was our story. > > I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the > most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since > it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > > Hi - > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > > If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s > > value I can recognize. > > > The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved > > in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. > > > Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do > > about > > mine. > > > A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to > > delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can > > we > > try and pick one quickly? > > Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. > > In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then > we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > Harbs > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important > > for > > all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > > Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is > > important in > > a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't > > get a > > fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we > > explain > > all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, > > since > > this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and > that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other > > than > > JS!! > > (If we want in future years to make it possible). > > @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> <+48%20880%20859%20557> > skype: zarzycki10 > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > skype: zarzycki10 > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > > > -- <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
