Hi - I did a quick suitable name search.
Royale might be taken by this individual’s project https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale <https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale> Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly. There is a lot of “Clash Royale" And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. Regards, Dave > On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Hi - > > We have one alternative name - Royale > > Are there others that people would like to propose? > > If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Om, >> >> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. If we >> want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more complicated >> VOTE counting. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: >>> >>> 1. Royale >>> 2. XXX >>> 3. YYY >>> 4. FlexJS >>> >>> One vote should answer both questions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Om >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the >>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with >>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed name... >>>> >>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still with >>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least one >>>> day more before VOTE. >>>> >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new >>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always >>>> state >>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the >>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since >>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Piotr >>>>> >>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi - >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s >>>>>> value I can recognize. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved >>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do >>>> about >>>>>> mine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to >>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can >>>> we >>>>>> try and pick one quickly? >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >>>>>> >>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then >>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important >>>>>> for >>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is >>>>>> important in >>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't >>>>>> get a >>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we >>>>>> explain >>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, >>>>>> since >>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and >>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other >>>> than >>>>>> JS!! >>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> >>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> >>>>> skype: zarzycki10 >>>>> >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >>>> skype: zarzycki10 >>>> >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
