Hi Alex, Let’s slow the roll and see what the people say when the sun is shining on their part of the globe.
Regards, Dave > On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > I prefer not to rush a vote for FlexJS because I feel like Carlos and Om > are starting to change some minds. AFAICT, everyone who was in favor of > FlexJS as the name was mainly concerned about how migrating Flex customers > will find that we have something that can help them. And the answer to > that is going to affect my decision, so maybe we need to focus on that > quickly. > > It could be that it doesn’t matter whether FlexJS is the product name > because migrating customers just want to know that it is a next generation > of Flex and can help them with migration and don't care what it is called. > > > Also, we have a transition problem anyway. If the fork is approved, we're > going to want to put in redirects on parts of flex.a.o that mention FlexJS > referring to the fork. Maybe those redirects could go anywhere unless > folks will somehow be more assured by landing on a FlexJS page instead of > a Foo page? IOW, maybe FlexJS is out there enough that redirects will be > how people find us regardless of name. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > On 9/13/17, 1:59 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. >>> >>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s >>> value I can recognize. >>> >>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved >>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. >>> >>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do about >>> mine. >>> >>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to >>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can >>> we try and pick one quickly? >> >> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >> >> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then >> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >>> >>> Harbs >>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira >>>> <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important >>>> for >>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >>>> >>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is >>>> important in >>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't >>>> get a >>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we >>>> explain >>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, >>>> since >>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and >>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other than >>>> JS!! >>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >>>> >>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
