Royale makes me think of French hamburgers :-)
I do like Bend To keep things simple, my prime candidate is still simply FlexJS EdB On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex > found? > > We are writing in AS - what about emphasis this to RoyaleAS? > > I'm still not sure yet whether name change convince me.. > > Piotr > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017, 03:35 Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > > > Wasn't Royale the beta name for some version of Flex? [Flex 2? or was > > it Flex 1?] > > > > > > On 9/13/2017 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > > > I did a quick suitable name search. > > > > > > Royale might be taken by this individual’s project > > > https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale > > > > > > Otherwise Royale in a TESS search is liquor and beauty products mostly. > > > There is a lot of “Clash Royale" > > > > > > And there is also “Royale with Cheese” - a reference in Pulp Fiction > > > to what a Macdonald’s Quarter Pounder is called in Paris. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dave > > > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > >> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi - > > >> > > >> We have one alternative name - Royale > > >> > > >> Are there others that people would like to propose? > > >> > > >> If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Dave > > >> > > >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > >>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi Om, > > >>> > > >>> I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. > > >>> If we want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more > > >>> complicated VOTE counting. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Dave > > >>> > > >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > >>>> <bigosma...@gmail.com <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> We could always structure the VOTE like this: > > >>>> > > >>>> 1. Royale > > >>>> 2. XXX > > >>>> 3. YYY > > >>>> 4. FlexJS > > >>>> > > >>>> One vote should answer both questions. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> Om > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > > >>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not > > >>>>> change the > > >>>>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help > with > > >>>>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed > > >>>>> name... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still > > >>>>> with > > >>>>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at > > >>>>> least one > > >>>>> day more before VOTE. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Piotr > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki > > >>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to > > >>>>>> build new > > >>>>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can > > always > > >>>>> state > > >>>>>> from where we have come and what was our story. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" > > >>>>>> as the > > >>>>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use > > >>>>>> it since > > >>>>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>> Piotr > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net > > >>>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi - > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, > > >>>>>>>> that’s > > >>>>>>> value I can recognize. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be > > >>>>>>>> involved > > >>>>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around > > >>>>>>> the name. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I > do > > >>>>> about > > >>>>>>> mine. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t > > >>>>>>>> want to > > >>>>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new > > >>>>>>> name can > > >>>>> we > > >>>>>>> try and pick one quickly? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow > morning. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the > > >>>>>>> result then > > >>>>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>> Dave > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Harbs > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > >>>>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com > > >>>>>>> <mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really > > >>>>>>>>> important > > >>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is > > >>>>>>> important in > > >>>>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we > > >>>>>>>>> don't > > >>>>>>> get a > > >>>>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where > we > > >>>>>>> explain > > >>>>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our > > >>>>>>>>> time, > > >>>>>>> since > > >>>>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS > > >>>>>>>>> projects, and > > >>>>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things > other > > >>>>> than > > >>>>>>> JS!! > > >>>>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name > > for > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > > >>>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > >>>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > > >>>>> > > >>>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 > > >>>>> skype: zarzycki10 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > >>>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > Jeffry Houser > > Technical Entrepreneur > > http://www.dot-com-it.com > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > 203-379-0773 > > > > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
