Hi - We have one alternative name - Royale
Are there others that people would like to propose? If not then we can have a simple VOTE between FlexJS and Royale. Regards, Dave > On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Hi Om, > > I think that dilutes the votes and biases the result towards FlexJS. If we > want to go that way then we need a preference ranking and more complicated > VOTE counting. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> We could always structure the VOTE like this: >> >> 1. Royale >> 2. XXX >> 3. YYY >> 4. FlexJS >> >> One vote should answer both questions. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the >>> name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with >>> porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed name... >>> >>> Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still with >>> nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least one >>> day more before VOTE. >>> >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> >>> 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. >>>> >>>> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new >>>> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always >>> state >>>> from where we have come and what was our story. >>>> >>>> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the >>>> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since >>>> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: >>>> >>>>> Hi - >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s >>>>> value I can recognize. >>>>>> >>>>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved >>>>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. >>>>>> >>>>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do >>> about >>>>> mine. >>>>>> >>>>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to >>>>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can >>> we >>>>> try and pick one quickly? >>>>> >>>>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >>>>> >>>>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then >>>>> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Harbs >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>>>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important >>>>> for >>>>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is >>>>> important in >>>>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't >>>>> get a >>>>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we >>>>> explain >>>>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, >>>>> since >>>>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and >>>>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other >>> than >>>>> JS!! >>>>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> >>>> skype: zarzycki10 >>>> >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >>> skype: zarzycki10 >>> >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >>> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >>> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
