We could always structure the VOTE like this: 1. Royale 2. XXX 3. YYY 4. FlexJS
One vote should answer both questions. Thanks, Om On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the > name and Alex is right. - I'm seeing more people asking for help with > porting. - We may disappear in the sea of frameworks with changed name... > > Maybe better have solid framework and invest in current name still with > nice branding. I'm puzzled, so definitely I will give myself at least one > day more before VOTE. > > Piotr > > > > 2017-09-13 23:31 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. > > > > I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new > > brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always > state > > from where we have come and what was our story. > > > > I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the > > most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it since > > it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > > > >> Hi - > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> > On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > >> > > >> > If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s > >> value I can recognize. > >> > > >> > The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved > >> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. > >> > > >> > Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do > about > >> mine. > >> > > >> > A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to > >> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can > we > >> try and pick one quickly? > >> > >> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. > >> > >> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then > >> we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Harbs > >> > > >> >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < > >> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important > >> for > >> >> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. > >> >> > >> >> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is > >> important in > >> >> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't > >> get a > >> >> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we > >> explain > >> >> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, > >> since > >> >> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and > >> >> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other > than > >> JS!! > >> >> (If we want in future years to make it possible). > >> >> > >> >> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557> > > skype: zarzycki10 > > > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 > skype: zarzycki10 > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >
