I thought that name things was one of the concerns in the thread from board. Maybe including link with the vote where we decide whether we would like to change the name or not can be helpful to start talk about the proposal.
If no one oppose I could start soon with [VOTE] Should we change name of forked project? If someone would be +1 should propose some names. Later we could start VOTE thread with all names proposition - in order to vote on specific one. Thoughts ? Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-13 12:30 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > I’m fine with voting now. I think the reasons for and against have more or > less been addressed. The only point which has not really been addressed was > Alex’s question. > > Personally I don’t think the project name is really a concern as far as > some unknown direction the project might take. If it develops to a point > where the JS suffix is a problem, we can try and figure out the answer to > that question at that time. > > Thanks, > Harbs > > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J < > mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: > > > > Probably could vote on the name change. But if that passes, it would > need a discussion thread for the new name. > > > > > > -Mark K > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 6:06 AM > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork > > > > Agreed with Mark completely! Especially in case of IDEs. > > > > I will summarize discussion tomorrow for the notice to the board that we > > have consensus or not. > > > > If there will not be more voices for change than for staying with current > > one do we still need start a Vote - Something like: Change name or not ? > > Dave what do you think about that ? > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
