I would be very interested in hearing how an experiment like that would work out.
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Jason Taylor <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote: > > Why would we be implementing anything? I'm talking about taking LightSpark as > is (with their 252 open bugs) compiling it to LLVM, using that input for the > WebAssembly compiler and compiling the output binary as a LightSpark > WebAssembly drop in flash player. This has nothing to do with the existing > FlexJS work and is merely to allow the existing flash apps to run in browser, > cross platform without a plug-in (such as Safari on iOS). Not quite sure > what exactly is so crazy here. Sorry, FlexJS will never give us the > performance we (Dedoose) need, so extending the life cycle of the flash > player a couple more years to buy us time for a complete rewrite in a > performant client technology is pretty important to us. > ~ JT > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Yang [mailto:flashflex...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 1:46 PM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: WebAssembly Flash ByPass > > No mean to be offensive, implementing everything in WebAssembly feels just > like talking about living in Mars, even with HTML/Javascript/CSS regardless > of performance, after so many years ... > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM, piotrz <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Gary, >> >> Please be tolerant to Jason's opinion and ideas. Apache Flex is an >> open source project and if Jason would like to bring some idea here he >> is very welcome, same as you. >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> ----- >> Apache Flex PMC >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex- >> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-feature-chart-work- >> status-tp61035p61082.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>
