Why would we be implementing anything? I'm talking about taking LightSpark as is (with their 252 open bugs) compiling it to LLVM, using that input for the WebAssembly compiler and compiling the output binary as a LightSpark WebAssembly drop in flash player. This has nothing to do with the existing FlexJS work and is merely to allow the existing flash apps to run in browser, cross platform without a plug-in (such as Safari on iOS). Not quite sure what exactly is so crazy here. Sorry, FlexJS will never give us the performance we (Dedoose) need, so extending the life cycle of the flash player a couple more years to buy us time for a complete rewrite in a performant client technology is pretty important to us. ~ JT
-----Original Message----- From: Gary Yang [mailto:flashflex...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 1:46 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: WebAssembly Flash ByPass No mean to be offensive, implementing everything in WebAssembly feels just like talking about living in Mars, even with HTML/Javascript/CSS regardless of performance, after so many years ... On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM, piotrz <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gary, > > Please be tolerant to Jason's opinion and ideas. Apache Flex is an > open source project and if Jason would like to bring some idea here he > is very welcome, same as you. > > Piotr > > > > ----- > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-feature-chart-work- > status-tp61035p61082.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
