There shouldn’t be any special arguments as long as MXMC is picking up the
flex-config.xml from the FlexJS directory. Check the flexlib argument.
Usually it looks like:
+flexlib=<path to FlexJS SDK>/frameworks
-Alex
On 5/8/15, 9:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>What are the compiler args for the mxml version ?
>
>Thanks,
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS
>> Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:59:03 +0000
>>
>> In the examples folder is a DataBindingTest_as folder that has no MXML
>>if
>> you want to try that.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 5/8/15, 8:56 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >@Alex I must have been having a brain fart, I see no reason that
>>IntelliJ
>> >would hard code that stuff but it makes no sense at all why it's not
>> >reading them correctly.
>> >
>> >The only key piece that is different is it's MXML and not an .as file.
>>So
>> >I
>> >haven't tried to see if the classes resolve in a normal .as file
>> >
>> >Mike
>> >
>> >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Gee, I would hope that IntelliJ wouldn’t hard code stuff like
>> >>namespaces.
>> >> If one of you has time, you could create a subclass of Spark
>>Application
>> >> and Spark Label into its own SWC with its own namespace and see if
>>you
>> >>can
>> >> use that in an IntelliJ Flex “Hello World” project without any Spark
>>or
>> >>MX
>> >> namespaces in the MXML, because that’s essentially what we are
>>trying to
>> >> do.
>> >>
>> >> I noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that it appears that IntelliJ has a
>> >>few
>> >> plug-ins for the flex-compiler and also add flex-oem-compiler.jar to
>>the
>> >> class path. FlexJS has a hacked up flex-oem-compiler.jar that has
>>just
>> >> enough stuff to fool FB into allowing it to compile FlexJS SWFS. It
>> >>could
>> >> be that we need a few more hacks there to make IntelliJ happy.
>> >>
>> >> I also noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that IntelliJ seems to be auto
>> >> generating an XML file for the -load-config parameter. I would
>>expect
>> >>the
>> >> “js” namespace and references to the right SWCs to be in that XML
>>file.
>> >> Maybe IntelliJ doesn’t know how to generate that from the
>> >>flex-config.xml
>> >> in FlexJS.
>> >>
>> >> If someone can post the contents of such an XML file it might contain
>> >>some
>> >> clues.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 5/8/15, 3:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Ok, been to long, I am an idiot;
>> >> >
>> >> ><component className="spark.layouts:VerticalLayout"
>> >>name="VerticalLayout"
>> >> >uri="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" />
>> >> >
>> >> ><component className="org.apache.flex.charts:BarChart"
>>name="BarChart"
>> >> >uri="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"/>
>> >> >
>> >> >So actually, IntelliJ is not parsing the manifest or reading it
>> >>crrectly.
>> >> >There is no Difference with FlexJS and Spark's manifest and app
>> >> >declarations.
>> >> >
>> >> >Mike
>> >> >
>> >> >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Michael Schmalle
>> >> ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Yeah, agreed, and since we don't know what JetBrains is doing...
>>They
>> >> >>must
>> >> >> be hard coding the fx/spark namespaces in the SDK plugin code.
>>That
>> >> >>seems
>> >> >> like the only reasonable answer to this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's easy to map a package namespace dynamically but I am trying
>>to
>> >> >>think
>> >> >> how a url would get mapped in a SWC since if I remember, there is
>>no
>> >> >> namespace definition of a url in the Flex SWC right? So if that is
>> >>the
>> >> >> case, a url would have to be hardcoded somewhere in IntelliJ's SDK
>> >> >>plugin
>> >> >> code.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Mike
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Yes, what I thought too and was wondering if we had a kind of
>>same
>> >> >>>thing
>> >> >>> on Randori to manage, apparently not, so, it has to be done at
>>some
>> >> >>>point
>> >> >>> for FlexJS if we go forward with IJ.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 06:10:31 -0400
>> >> >>> > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support
>> >> >>>FlexJS
>> >> >>> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Fred, I don't know exactly what you did int he plugin but if I
>> >> >>>remember
>> >> >>> > correctly, we were just unzipping the rbl, copying the swcs to
>>the
>> >> >>> > library/sdk location and adding the SWC to Intellij through the
>> >> >>>plugin
>> >> >>> > code. Nothing special about namespaces.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > But, the difference I do know is, we did not use a url for
>> >>anything.
>> >> >>>I
>> >> >>> have
>> >> >>> > a feeling the js namespace url is what is choking IntelliJ.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Mike
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>> >> >>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > > Hi,
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx
>>namespace.
>> >>So
>> >> >>>it
>> >> >>> seems
>> >> >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening
>> >>that
>> >> >>> IntelliJ
>> >> >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > You are right and that's 2 years or so I didn't touch the
>> >>IntelliJ
>> >> >>> API,
>> >> >>> > > so, can't remember if we worked on the NS or not.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating
>> >>projects
>> >> >>>and
>> >> >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is
>>to
>> >> >>>define
>> >> >>> a
>> >> >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I
>> >>know
>> >> >>> there
>> >> >>> > > are
>> >> >>> > > > benefits.
>> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >>> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external
>>tool as
>> >> >>> well. I
>> >> >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until
>> >>something
>> >> >>> works
>> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >>> > > > is not a workflow killer.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > Yep and now I'm not sure anymore, I still need to confirm or
>> >> >>>infirm I
>> >> >>> can
>> >> >>> > > switch on Facet as I can't remember for sure how the Flex
>>Plugin
>> >> >>> considers
>> >> >>> > > it is a Flex SDK or not, that's a long time and I will need
>>to
>> >>dig
>> >> >>> into
>> >> >>> > > again.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > One question for the Flash Develop guys though, how are the
>> >> >>> intelli-sense
>> >> >>> > > / refactoring / code navigation / hints and other IDE
>>facilities
>> >> >>> including
>> >> >>> > > maven integration compared to IntelliJ, do we have a
>>comparative
>> >> >>> table ?
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > Thanks,
>> >> >>> > > Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:43 -0400
>> >> >>> > > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to
>> >>support
>> >> >>> FlexJS
>> >> >>> > > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >>> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx
>>namespace.
>> >>So
>> >> >>>it
>> >> >>> seems
>> >> >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening
>> >>that
>> >> >>> IntelliJ
>> >> >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly.
>> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating
>> >>projects
>> >> >>>and
>> >> >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is
>>to
>> >> >>>define
>> >> >>> a
>> >> >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I
>> >>know
>> >> >>> there
>> >> >>> > > are
>> >> >>> > > > benefits.
>> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >>> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external
>>tool as
>> >> >>> well. I
>> >> >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until
>> >>something
>> >> >>> works
>> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >>> > > > is not a workflow killer.
>> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >>> > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui
>><aha...@adobe.com>
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > Hi Fred,
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > Thanks for trying. One question though: why is a
>>plug-in
>> >>even
>> >> >>> > > needed? I
>> >> >>> > > > > was told by an IntelliJ engineer that they simply call
>> >>mxmlc.
>> >> >>>If
>> >> >>> > > that’s
>> >> >>> > > > > true, then it should “just work”. Piotr’s screenshot
>>sort of
>> >> >>> implied
>> >> >>> > > that
>> >> >>> > > > > the compiler may have run or does IntelliJ have a
>>different
>> >> >>> > > > > code-intelligence engine and that’s what we’re seeing in
>>the
>> >> >>> errors.
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > @Piotr, am I right that the things in red in the
>>screenshot
>> >>are
>> >> >>> errors?
>> >> >>> > > > > What was the actual error output?
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > -Alex
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > On 5/7/15, 6:06 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS"
>> >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >Hi Mike,
>> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >Yes I just started and it is on my little spare time
>>but if
>> >> >>>you
>> >> >>> want
>> >> >>> > > an
>> >> >>> > > > > >idea of what's going on, you can try to compile it and
>>you
>> >> >>>will
>> >> >>> see
>> >> >>> > > > > >things have changed and I need to figure out what to use
>> >>now
>> >> >>> instead
>> >> >>> > > of
>> >> >>> > > > > >BrowsersConfiguaration, ModuleChunk, the deprecated
>> >> >>> > > TranslatingCompiler,
>> >> >>> > > > > >etc.. and at the moment I don't know yet where to find
>>that
>> >> >>>out
>> >> >>> given
>> >> >>> > > the
>> >> >>> > > > > >poor documentation, will have to skim the source code I
>> >>guess.
>> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:58:28 -0400
>> >> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers
>>to
>> >> >>>support
>> >> >>> > > FlexJS
>> >> >>> > > > > >> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> Fred, I didn't know you were giving that a go. I don't
>> >>have
>> >> >>> enough
>> >> >>> > > time
>> >> >>> > > > > >>to
>> >> >>> > > > > >> get into the plugin if that is what you are working
>>on,
>> >> >>>which
>> >> >>> is
>> >> >>> > > > > >>fantastic
>> >> >>> > > > > >> if you are. But, I am willing to try and match your
>>time
>> >>if
>> >> >>> you are
>> >> >>> > > now
>> >> >>> > > > > >> devoting (some)time to trying an Intellij plugin.
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> I guess there is work to be done on FalconJx, I know
>> >>when I
>> >> >>> left
>> >> >>> > > > > >>developing
>> >> >>> > > > > >> it I had a bunch of todos left and unit tests to
>>write.
>> >>This
>> >> >>> was my
>> >> >>> > > > > >>whole
>> >> >>> > > > > >> quandary, for the time I would have to donate, I need
>> >> >>>Intellij
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> > > > > >>really
>> >> >>> > > > > >> don't want to use FlashBuilder since it's crusty and
>> >>gets no
>> >> >>> love.
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> Keep me updated with what you are doing.
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> Mike
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >>> > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > Hi,
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > A bit of updates:
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > - I understood FlexJS got rid of the Flex SDK
>> >> >>>depnedencies,
>> >> >>> if
>> >> >>> > > yes, I
>> >> >>> > > > > >>will
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > need to stick mostly on my same base code, can't
>>use a
>> >> >>>facet
>> >> >>> > > AFAIK.
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > - I've been trying to compile the Randori plugin
>> >>against
>> >> >>>the
>> >> >>> last
>> >> >>> > > > > >>IntelliJ
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > but many things have changed in their code base and
>>it
>> >> >>> failed to
>> >> >>> > > > > >>compile,
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > will have to fix that first before to branch it.
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > So, we are still far to have a working plugin at
>>this
>> >> >>>stage
>> >> >>> and
>> >> >>> > > given
>> >> >>> > > > > >>the
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > time I can spend on it.
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > Any IntelliJ plugin guru to give a hand ?
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 03:00:30 -0700
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE
>>developers
>> >>to
>> >> >>> support
>> >> >>> > > > > >>FlexJS
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Additionally I have checked also new version of
>> >>FlexJS
>> >> >>> with FDT
>> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >>> > > > > >>it
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > doesn't work anymore.
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > I have error during to compilation that FlexJS.swc
>> >> >>>doesn't
>> >> >>> > > exists -
>> >> >>> > > > > >>We
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > have
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > currently bunch of swcs.
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > I am not sure do we need to contact with FDT team
>>?
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Alex,
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > After your changes to many swcs in FlexJS - Did
>>you
>> >> >>>have to
>> >> >>> > > change
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > process
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > of creation/import new project to FB in some way ?
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Piotr
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > -----
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Apache Flex PMC
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > --
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > View this message in context:
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >>
>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-out
>> >> >>>-
>> >> >>> > > > > >>to-IDE-developers-to-support-FlexJS-tp32656p46277.html
>> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list
>> >> >>>archive
>> >> >>> at
>> >> >>> > > > > >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
