Ok, been to long, I am an idiot; <component className="spark.layouts:VerticalLayout" name="VerticalLayout" uri="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" />
<component className="org.apache.flex.charts:BarChart" name="BarChart" uri="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"/> So actually, IntelliJ is not parsing the manifest or reading it crrectly. There is no Difference with FlexJS and Spark's manifest and app declarations. Mike On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, agreed, and since we don't know what JetBrains is doing... They must > be hard coding the fx/spark namespaces in the SDK plugin code. That seems > like the only reasonable answer to this. > > It's easy to map a package namespace dynamically but I am trying to think > how a url would get mapped in a SWC since if I remember, there is no > namespace definition of a url in the Flex SWC right? So if that is the > case, a url would have to be hardcoded somewhere in IntelliJ's SDK plugin > code. > > Mike > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, what I thought too and was wondering if we had a kind of same thing >> on Randori to manage, apparently not, so, it has to be done at some point >> for FlexJS if we go forward with IJ. >> >> Thanks, >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 06:10:31 -0400 >> > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS >> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > >> > Fred, I don't know exactly what you did int he plugin but if I remember >> > correctly, we were just unzipping the rbl, copying the swcs to the >> > library/sdk location and adding the SWC to Intellij through the plugin >> > code. Nothing special about namespaces. >> > >> > But, the difference I do know is, we did not use a url for anything. I >> have >> > a feeling the js namespace url is what is choking IntelliJ. >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < >> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. So it >> seems >> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening that >> IntelliJ >> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. >> > > >> > > You are right and that's 2 years or so I didn't touch the IntelliJ >> API, >> > > so, can't remember if we worked on the NS or not. >> > > >> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating projects and >> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to define >> a >> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I know >> there >> > > are >> > > > benefits. >> > > > >> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as >> well. I >> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until something >> works >> > > and >> > > > is not a workflow killer. >> > > >> > > Yep and now I'm not sure anymore, I still need to confirm or infirm I >> can >> > > switch on Facet as I can't remember for sure how the Flex Plugin >> considers >> > > it is a Flex SDK or not, that's a long time and I will need to dig >> into >> > > again. >> > > >> > > One question for the Flash Develop guys though, how are the >> intelli-sense >> > > / refactoring / code navigation / hints and other IDE facilities >> including >> > > maven integration compared to IntelliJ, do we have a comparative >> table ? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:43 -0400 >> > > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support >> FlexJS >> > > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > >> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. So it >> seems >> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening that >> IntelliJ >> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. >> > > > >> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating projects and >> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to define >> a >> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I know >> there >> > > are >> > > > benefits. >> > > > >> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as >> well. I >> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until something >> works >> > > and >> > > > is not a workflow killer. >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Fred, >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks for trying. One question though: why is a plug-in even >> > > needed? I >> > > > > was told by an IntelliJ engineer that they simply call mxmlc. If >> > > that’s >> > > > > true, then it should “just work”. Piotr’s screenshot sort of >> implied >> > > that >> > > > > the compiler may have run or does IntelliJ have a different >> > > > > code-intelligence engine and that’s what we’re seeing in the >> errors. >> > > > > >> > > > > @Piotr, am I right that the things in red in the screenshot are >> errors? >> > > > > What was the actual error output? >> > > > > >> > > > > -Alex >> > > > > >> > > > > On 5/7/15, 6:06 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > >Hi Mike, >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Yes I just started and it is on my little spare time but if you >> want >> > > an >> > > > > >idea of what's going on, you can try to compile it and you will >> see >> > > > > >things have changed and I need to figure out what to use now >> instead >> > > of >> > > > > >BrowsersConfiguaration, ModuleChunk, the deprecated >> > > TranslatingCompiler, >> > > > > >etc.. and at the moment I don't know yet where to find that out >> given >> > > the >> > > > > >poor documentation, will have to skim the source code I guess. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:58:28 -0400 >> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support >> > > FlexJS >> > > > > >> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Fred, I didn't know you were giving that a go. I don't have >> enough >> > > time >> > > > > >>to >> > > > > >> get into the plugin if that is what you are working on, which >> is >> > > > > >>fantastic >> > > > > >> if you are. But, I am willing to try and match your time if >> you are >> > > now >> > > > > >> devoting (some)time to trying an Intellij plugin. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I guess there is work to be done on FalconJx, I know when I >> left >> > > > > >>developing >> > > > > >> it I had a bunch of todos left and unit tests to write. This >> was my >> > > > > >>whole >> > > > > >> quandary, for the time I would have to donate, I need Intellij >> and >> > > > > >>really >> > > > > >> don't want to use FlashBuilder since it's crusty and gets no >> love. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Keep me updated with what you are doing. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Mike >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > Hi, >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > A bit of updates: >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > - I understood FlexJS got rid of the Flex SDK depnedencies, >> if >> > > yes, I >> > > > > >>will >> > > > > >> > need to stick mostly on my same base code, can't use a facet >> > > AFAIK. >> > > > > >> > - I've been trying to compile the Randori plugin against the >> last >> > > > > >>IntelliJ >> > > > > >> > but many things have changed in their code base and it >> failed to >> > > > > >>compile, >> > > > > >> > will have to fix that first before to branch it. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > So, we are still far to have a working plugin at this stage >> and >> > > given >> > > > > >>the >> > > > > >> > time I can spend on it. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Any IntelliJ plugin guru to give a hand ? >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, >> > > > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 03:00:30 -0700 >> > > > > >> > > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to >> support >> > > > > >>FlexJS >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > Additionally I have checked also new version of FlexJS >> with FDT >> > > and >> > > > > >>it >> > > > > >> > > doesn't work anymore. >> > > > > >> > > I have error during to compilation that FlexJS.swc doesn't >> > > exists - >> > > > > >>We >> > > > > >> > have >> > > > > >> > > currently bunch of swcs. >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > I am not sure do we need to contact with FDT team ? >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > Alex, >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > After your changes to many swcs in FlexJS - Did you have to >> > > change >> > > > > >> > process >> > > > > >> > > of creation/import new project to FB in some way ? >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > Piotr >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > ----- >> > > > > >> > > Apache Flex PMC >> > > > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > -- >> > > > > >> > > View this message in context: >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-out- >> > > > > >>to-IDE-developers-to-support-FlexJS-tp32656p46277.html >> > > > > >> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive >> at >> > > > > >>Nabble.com. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
