Gee, I would hope that IntelliJ wouldn’t hard code stuff like namespaces. If one of you has time, you could create a subclass of Spark Application and Spark Label into its own SWC with its own namespace and see if you can use that in an IntelliJ Flex “Hello World” project without any Spark or MX namespaces in the MXML, because that’s essentially what we are trying to do.
I noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that it appears that IntelliJ has a few plug-ins for the flex-compiler and also add flex-oem-compiler.jar to the class path. FlexJS has a hacked up flex-oem-compiler.jar that has just enough stuff to fool FB into allowing it to compile FlexJS SWFS. It could be that we need a few more hacks there to make IntelliJ happy. I also noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that IntelliJ seems to be auto generating an XML file for the -load-config parameter. I would expect the “js” namespace and references to the right SWCs to be in that XML file. Maybe IntelliJ doesn’t know how to generate that from the flex-config.xml in FlexJS. If someone can post the contents of such an XML file it might contain some clues. Thanks, -Alex On 5/8/15, 3:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: >Ok, been to long, I am an idiot; > ><component className="spark.layouts:VerticalLayout" name="VerticalLayout" >uri="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" /> > ><component className="org.apache.flex.charts:BarChart" name="BarChart" >uri="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"/> > >So actually, IntelliJ is not parsing the manifest or reading it crrectly. >There is no Difference with FlexJS and Spark's manifest and app >declarations. > >Mike > >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Michael Schmalle ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> Yeah, agreed, and since we don't know what JetBrains is doing... They >>must >> be hard coding the fx/spark namespaces in the SDK plugin code. That >>seems >> like the only reasonable answer to this. >> >> It's easy to map a package namespace dynamically but I am trying to >>think >> how a url would get mapped in a SWC since if I remember, there is no >> namespace definition of a url in the Flex SWC right? So if that is the >> case, a url would have to be hardcoded somewhere in IntelliJ's SDK >>plugin >> code. >> >> Mike >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Frédéric THOMAS >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, what I thought too and was wondering if we had a kind of same >>>thing >>> on Randori to manage, apparently not, so, it has to be done at some >>>point >>> for FlexJS if we go forward with IJ. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Frédéric THOMAS >>> >>> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 06:10:31 -0400 >>> > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support >>>FlexJS >>> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> > >>> > Fred, I don't know exactly what you did int he plugin but if I >>>remember >>> > correctly, we were just unzipping the rbl, copying the swcs to the >>> > library/sdk location and adding the SWC to Intellij through the >>>plugin >>> > code. Nothing special about namespaces. >>> > >>> > But, the difference I do know is, we did not use a url for anything. >>>I >>> have >>> > a feeling the js namespace url is what is choking IntelliJ. >>> > >>> > Mike >>> > >>> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < >>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. So >>>it >>> seems >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening that >>> IntelliJ >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. >>> > > >>> > > You are right and that's 2 years or so I didn't touch the IntelliJ >>> API, >>> > > so, can't remember if we worked on the NS or not. >>> > > >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating projects >>>and >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to >>>define >>> a >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I know >>> there >>> > > are >>> > > > benefits. >>> > > > >>> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as >>> well. I >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until something >>> works >>> > > and >>> > > > is not a workflow killer. >>> > > >>> > > Yep and now I'm not sure anymore, I still need to confirm or >>>infirm I >>> can >>> > > switch on Facet as I can't remember for sure how the Flex Plugin >>> considers >>> > > it is a Flex SDK or not, that's a long time and I will need to dig >>> into >>> > > again. >>> > > >>> > > One question for the Flash Develop guys though, how are the >>> intelli-sense >>> > > / refactoring / code navigation / hints and other IDE facilities >>> including >>> > > maven integration compared to IntelliJ, do we have a comparative >>> table ? >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Frédéric THOMAS >>> > > >>> > > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:43 -0400 >>> > > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support >>> FlexJS >>> > > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >>> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> > > > >>> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. So >>>it >>> seems >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening that >>> IntelliJ >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. >>> > > > >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating projects >>>and >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to >>>define >>> a >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I know >>> there >>> > > are >>> > > > benefits. >>> > > > >>> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as >>> well. I >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until something >>> works >>> > > and >>> > > > is not a workflow killer. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Hi Fred, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks for trying. One question though: why is a plug-in even >>> > > needed? I >>> > > > > was told by an IntelliJ engineer that they simply call mxmlc. >>>If >>> > > that’s >>> > > > > true, then it should “just work”. Piotr’s screenshot sort of >>> implied >>> > > that >>> > > > > the compiler may have run or does IntelliJ have a different >>> > > > > code-intelligence engine and that’s what we’re seeing in the >>> errors. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > @Piotr, am I right that the things in red in the screenshot are >>> errors? >>> > > > > What was the actual error output? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > -Alex >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On 5/7/15, 6:06 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >Hi Mike, >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >Yes I just started and it is on my little spare time but if >>>you >>> want >>> > > an >>> > > > > >idea of what's going on, you can try to compile it and you >>>will >>> see >>> > > > > >things have changed and I need to figure out what to use now >>> instead >>> > > of >>> > > > > >BrowsersConfiguaration, ModuleChunk, the deprecated >>> > > TranslatingCompiler, >>> > > > > >etc.. and at the moment I don't know yet where to find that >>>out >>> given >>> > > the >>> > > > > >poor documentation, will have to skim the source code I guess. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:58:28 -0400 >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to >>>support >>> > > FlexJS >>> > > > > >> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >>> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Fred, I didn't know you were giving that a go. I don't have >>> enough >>> > > time >>> > > > > >>to >>> > > > > >> get into the plugin if that is what you are working on, >>>which >>> is >>> > > > > >>fantastic >>> > > > > >> if you are. But, I am willing to try and match your time if >>> you are >>> > > now >>> > > > > >> devoting (some)time to trying an Intellij plugin. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> I guess there is work to be done on FalconJx, I know when I >>> left >>> > > > > >>developing >>> > > > > >> it I had a bunch of todos left and unit tests to write. This >>> was my >>> > > > > >>whole >>> > > > > >> quandary, for the time I would have to donate, I need >>>Intellij >>> and >>> > > > > >>really >>> > > > > >> don't want to use FlashBuilder since it's crusty and gets no >>> love. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Keep me updated with what you are doing. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Mike >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS >>> > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>> > > > > >> wrote: >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > Hi, >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > A bit of updates: >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > - I understood FlexJS got rid of the Flex SDK >>>depnedencies, >>> if >>> > > yes, I >>> > > > > >>will >>> > > > > >> > need to stick mostly on my same base code, can't use a >>>facet >>> > > AFAIK. >>> > > > > >> > - I've been trying to compile the Randori plugin against >>>the >>> last >>> > > > > >>IntelliJ >>> > > > > >> > but many things have changed in their code base and it >>> failed to >>> > > > > >>compile, >>> > > > > >> > will have to fix that first before to branch it. >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > So, we are still far to have a working plugin at this >>>stage >>> and >>> > > given >>> > > > > >>the >>> > > > > >> > time I can spend on it. >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > Any IntelliJ plugin guru to give a hand ? >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > Thanks, >>> > > > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 03:00:30 -0700 >>> > > > > >> > > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> > > > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to >>> support >>> > > > > >>FlexJS >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > Additionally I have checked also new version of FlexJS >>> with FDT >>> > > and >>> > > > > >>it >>> > > > > >> > > doesn't work anymore. >>> > > > > >> > > I have error during to compilation that FlexJS.swc >>>doesn't >>> > > exists - >>> > > > > >>We >>> > > > > >> > have >>> > > > > >> > > currently bunch of swcs. >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > I am not sure do we need to contact with FDT team ? >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > Alex, >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > After your changes to many swcs in FlexJS - Did you >>>have to >>> > > change >>> > > > > >> > process >>> > > > > >> > > of creation/import new project to FB in some way ? >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > Piotr >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > ----- >>> > > > > >> > > Apache Flex PMC >>> > > > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> > > > > >> > > -- >>> > > > > >> > > View this message in context: >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> >>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-out >>>- >>> > > > > >>to-IDE-developers-to-support-FlexJS-tp32656p46277.html >>> > > > > >> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list >>>archive >>> at >>> > > > > >>Nabble.com. >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >>> >> >>
