Hi, What are the compiler args for the mxml version ?
Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:59:03 +0000 > > In the examples folder is a DataBindingTest_as folder that has no MXML if > you want to try that. > > -Alex > > On 5/8/15, 8:56 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >@Alex I must have been having a brain fart, I see no reason that IntelliJ > >would hard code that stuff but it makes no sense at all why it's not > >reading them correctly. > > > >The only key piece that is different is it's MXML and not an .as file. So > >I > >haven't tried to see if the classes resolve in a normal .as file > > > >Mike > > > >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Gee, I would hope that IntelliJ wouldn’t hard code stuff like > >>namespaces. > >> If one of you has time, you could create a subclass of Spark Application > >> and Spark Label into its own SWC with its own namespace and see if you > >>can > >> use that in an IntelliJ Flex “Hello World” project without any Spark or > >>MX > >> namespaces in the MXML, because that’s essentially what we are trying to > >> do. > >> > >> I noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that it appears that IntelliJ has a > >>few > >> plug-ins for the flex-compiler and also add flex-oem-compiler.jar to the > >> class path. FlexJS has a hacked up flex-oem-compiler.jar that has just > >> enough stuff to fool FB into allowing it to compile FlexJS SWFS. It > >>could > >> be that we need a few more hacks there to make IntelliJ happy. > >> > >> I also noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that IntelliJ seems to be auto > >> generating an XML file for the -load-config parameter. I would expect > >>the > >> “js” namespace and references to the right SWCs to be in that XML file. > >> Maybe IntelliJ doesn’t know how to generate that from the > >>flex-config.xml > >> in FlexJS. > >> > >> If someone can post the contents of such an XML file it might contain > >>some > >> clues. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 5/8/15, 3:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >> >Ok, been to long, I am an idiot; > >> > > >> ><component className="spark.layouts:VerticalLayout" > >>name="VerticalLayout" > >> >uri="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" /> > >> > > >> ><component className="org.apache.flex.charts:BarChart" name="BarChart" > >> >uri="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"/> > >> > > >> >So actually, IntelliJ is not parsing the manifest or reading it > >>crrectly. > >> >There is no Difference with FlexJS and Spark's manifest and app > >> >declarations. > >> > > >> >Mike > >> > > >> >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Michael Schmalle > >> ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com> > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> Yeah, agreed, and since we don't know what JetBrains is doing... They > >> >>must > >> >> be hard coding the fx/spark namespaces in the SDK plugin code. That > >> >>seems > >> >> like the only reasonable answer to this. > >> >> > >> >> It's easy to map a package namespace dynamically but I am trying to > >> >>think > >> >> how a url would get mapped in a SWC since if I remember, there is no > >> >> namespace definition of a url in the Flex SWC right? So if that is > >>the > >> >> case, a url would have to be hardcoded somewhere in IntelliJ's SDK > >> >>plugin > >> >> code. > >> >> > >> >> Mike > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Frédéric THOMAS > >> >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Yes, what I thought too and was wondering if we had a kind of same > >> >>>thing > >> >>> on Randori to manage, apparently not, so, it has to be done at some > >> >>>point > >> >>> for FlexJS if we go forward with IJ. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> Frédéric THOMAS > >> >>> > >> >>> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 06:10:31 -0400 > >> >>> > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support > >> >>>FlexJS > >> >>> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > >> >>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Fred, I don't know exactly what you did int he plugin but if I > >> >>>remember > >> >>> > correctly, we were just unzipping the rbl, copying the swcs to the > >> >>> > library/sdk location and adding the SWC to Intellij through the > >> >>>plugin > >> >>> > code. Nothing special about namespaces. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > But, the difference I do know is, we did not use a url for > >>anything. > >> >>>I > >> >>> have > >> >>> > a feeling the js namespace url is what is choking IntelliJ. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Mike > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < > >> >>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Hi, > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. > >>So > >> >>>it > >> >>> seems > >> >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening > >>that > >> >>> IntelliJ > >> >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > You are right and that's 2 years or so I didn't touch the > >>IntelliJ > >> >>> API, > >> >>> > > so, can't remember if we worked on the NS or not. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating > >>projects > >> >>>and > >> >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to > >> >>>define > >> >>> a > >> >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I > >>know > >> >>> there > >> >>> > > are > >> >>> > > > benefits. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as > >> >>> well. I > >> >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until > >>something > >> >>> works > >> >>> > > and > >> >>> > > > is not a workflow killer. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Yep and now I'm not sure anymore, I still need to confirm or > >> >>>infirm I > >> >>> can > >> >>> > > switch on Facet as I can't remember for sure how the Flex Plugin > >> >>> considers > >> >>> > > it is a Flex SDK or not, that's a long time and I will need to > >>dig > >> >>> into > >> >>> > > again. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > One question for the Flash Develop guys though, how are the > >> >>> intelli-sense > >> >>> > > / refactoring / code navigation / hints and other IDE facilities > >> >>> including > >> >>> > > maven integration compared to IntelliJ, do we have a comparative > >> >>> table ? > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > Thanks, > >> >>> > > Frédéric THOMAS > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:43 -0400 > >> >>> > > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to > >>support > >> >>> FlexJS > >> >>> > > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > >> >>> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. > >>So > >> >>>it > >> >>> seems > >> >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening > >>that > >> >>> IntelliJ > >> >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating > >>projects > >> >>>and > >> >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to > >> >>>define > >> >>> a > >> >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I > >>know > >> >>> there > >> >>> > > are > >> >>> > > > benefits. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as > >> >>> well. I > >> >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until > >>something > >> >>> works > >> >>> > > and > >> >>> > > > is not a workflow killer. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Hi Fred, > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Thanks for trying. One question though: why is a plug-in > >>even > >> >>> > > needed? I > >> >>> > > > > was told by an IntelliJ engineer that they simply call > >>mxmlc. > >> >>>If > >> >>> > > that’s > >> >>> > > > > true, then it should “just work”. Piotr’s screenshot sort of > >> >>> implied > >> >>> > > that > >> >>> > > > > the compiler may have run or does IntelliJ have a different > >> >>> > > > > code-intelligence engine and that’s what we’re seeing in the > >> >>> errors. > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > @Piotr, am I right that the things in red in the screenshot > >>are > >> >>> errors? > >> >>> > > > > What was the actual error output? > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > -Alex > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > On 5/7/15, 6:06 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >Hi Mike, > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >Yes I just started and it is on my little spare time but if > >> >>>you > >> >>> want > >> >>> > > an > >> >>> > > > > >idea of what's going on, you can try to compile it and you > >> >>>will > >> >>> see > >> >>> > > > > >things have changed and I need to figure out what to use > >>now > >> >>> instead > >> >>> > > of > >> >>> > > > > >BrowsersConfiguaration, ModuleChunk, the deprecated > >> >>> > > TranslatingCompiler, > >> >>> > > > > >etc.. and at the moment I don't know yet where to find that > >> >>>out > >> >>> given > >> >>> > > the > >> >>> > > > > >poor documentation, will have to skim the source code I > >>guess. > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:58:28 -0400 > >> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to > >> >>>support > >> >>> > > FlexJS > >> >>> > > > > >> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > >> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> Fred, I didn't know you were giving that a go. I don't > >>have > >> >>> enough > >> >>> > > time > >> >>> > > > > >>to > >> >>> > > > > >> get into the plugin if that is what you are working on, > >> >>>which > >> >>> is > >> >>> > > > > >>fantastic > >> >>> > > > > >> if you are. But, I am willing to try and match your time > >>if > >> >>> you are > >> >>> > > now > >> >>> > > > > >> devoting (some)time to trying an Intellij plugin. > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> I guess there is work to be done on FalconJx, I know > >>when I > >> >>> left > >> >>> > > > > >>developing > >> >>> > > > > >> it I had a bunch of todos left and unit tests to write. > >>This > >> >>> was my > >> >>> > > > > >>whole > >> >>> > > > > >> quandary, for the time I would have to donate, I need > >> >>>Intellij > >> >>> and > >> >>> > > > > >>really > >> >>> > > > > >> don't want to use FlashBuilder since it's crusty and > >>gets no > >> >>> love. > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> Keep me updated with what you are doing. > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> Mike > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS > >> >>> > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > >> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Hi, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > A bit of updates: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > - I understood FlexJS got rid of the Flex SDK > >> >>>depnedencies, > >> >>> if > >> >>> > > yes, I > >> >>> > > > > >>will > >> >>> > > > > >> > need to stick mostly on my same base code, can't use a > >> >>>facet > >> >>> > > AFAIK. > >> >>> > > > > >> > - I've been trying to compile the Randori plugin > >>against > >> >>>the > >> >>> last > >> >>> > > > > >>IntelliJ > >> >>> > > > > >> > but many things have changed in their code base and it > >> >>> failed to > >> >>> > > > > >>compile, > >> >>> > > > > >> > will have to fix that first before to branch it. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > So, we are still far to have a working plugin at this > >> >>>stage > >> >>> and > >> >>> > > given > >> >>> > > > > >>the > >> >>> > > > > >> > time I can spend on it. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > Any IntelliJ plugin guru to give a hand ? > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks, > >> >>> > > > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 03:00:30 -0700 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>> > > > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers > >>to > >> >>> support > >> >>> > > > > >>FlexJS > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Additionally I have checked also new version of > >>FlexJS > >> >>> with FDT > >> >>> > > and > >> >>> > > > > >>it > >> >>> > > > > >> > > doesn't work anymore. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > I have error during to compilation that FlexJS.swc > >> >>>doesn't > >> >>> > > exists - > >> >>> > > > > >>We > >> >>> > > > > >> > have > >> >>> > > > > >> > > currently bunch of swcs. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > I am not sure do we need to contact with FDT team ? > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Alex, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > After your changes to many swcs in FlexJS - Did you > >> >>>have to > >> >>> > > change > >> >>> > > > > >> > process > >> >>> > > > > >> > > of creation/import new project to FB in some way ? > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Piotr > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > ----- > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Apache Flex PMC > >> >>> > > > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>> > > > > >> > > -- > >> >>> > > > > >> > > View this message in context: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-out > >> >>>- > >> >>> > > > > >>to-IDE-developers-to-support-FlexJS-tp32656p46277.html > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list > >> >>>archive > >> >>> at > >> >>> > > > > >>Nabble.com. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >
