Hi, > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. So it seems > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening that IntelliJ > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly.
You are right and that's 2 years or so I didn't touch the IntelliJ API, so, can't remember if we worked on the NS or not. > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating projects and > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to define a > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I know there are > benefits. > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as well. I > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until something works and > is not a workflow killer. Yep and now I'm not sure anymore, I still need to confirm or infirm I can switch on Facet as I can't remember for sure how the Flex Plugin considers it is a Flex SDK or not, that's a long time and I will need to dig into again. One question for the Flash Develop guys though, how are the intelli-sense / refactoring / code navigation / hints and other IDE facilities including maven integration compared to IntelliJ, do we have a comparative table ? Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:43 -0400 > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > The red means that the IDE is not resolving the jx namespace. So it seems > to be a SWC namespace problem where something is happening that IntelliJ > doesn't read and resolve the manifest correctly. > > Why a plugin: Intellij has features that make creating projects and > dependencies easy. One reason, Fred can say I am wrong is to define a > FlexJS SDK type that can be created. I am a bit rusty but I know there are > benefits. > > You are also correct that it can be run as an external tool as well. I > guess it's just a matter of fiddling with things until something works and > is not a workflow killer. > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Hi Fred, > > > > Thanks for trying. One question though: why is a plug-in even needed? I > > was told by an IntelliJ engineer that they simply call mxmlc. If that’s > > true, then it should “just work”. Piotr’s screenshot sort of implied that > > the compiler may have run or does IntelliJ have a different > > code-intelligence engine and that’s what we’re seeing in the errors. > > > > @Piotr, am I right that the things in red in the screenshot are errors? > > What was the actual error output? > > > > -Alex > > > > On 5/7/15, 6:06 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >Hi Mike, > > > > > >Yes I just started and it is on my little spare time but if you want an > > >idea of what's going on, you can try to compile it and you will see > > >things have changed and I need to figure out what to use now instead of > > >BrowsersConfiguaration, ModuleChunk, the deprecated TranslatingCompiler, > > >etc.. and at the moment I don't know yet where to find that out given the > > >poor documentation, will have to skim the source code I guess. > > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:58:28 -0400 > > >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS > > >> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> Fred, I didn't know you were giving that a go. I don't have enough time > > >>to > > >> get into the plugin if that is what you are working on, which is > > >>fantastic > > >> if you are. But, I am willing to try and match your time if you are now > > >> devoting (some)time to trying an Intellij plugin. > > >> > > >> I guess there is work to be done on FalconJx, I know when I left > > >>developing > > >> it I had a bunch of todos left and unit tests to write. This was my > > >>whole > > >> quandary, for the time I would have to donate, I need Intellij and > > >>really > > >> don't want to use FlashBuilder since it's crusty and gets no love. > > >> > > >> Keep me updated with what you are doing. > > >> > > >> Mike > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > A bit of updates: > > >> > > > >> > - I understood FlexJS got rid of the Flex SDK depnedencies, if yes, I > > >>will > > >> > need to stick mostly on my same base code, can't use a facet AFAIK. > > >> > - I've been trying to compile the Randori plugin against the last > > >>IntelliJ > > >> > but many things have changed in their code base and it failed to > > >>compile, > > >> > will have to fix that first before to branch it. > > >> > > > >> > So, we are still far to have a working plugin at this stage and given > > >>the > > >> > time I can spend on it. > > >> > > > >> > Any IntelliJ plugin guru to give a hand ? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 03:00:30 -0700 > > >> > > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support > > >>FlexJS > > >> > > > > >> > > Additionally I have checked also new version of FlexJS with FDT and > > >>it > > >> > > doesn't work anymore. > > >> > > I have error during to compilation that FlexJS.swc doesn't exists - > > >>We > > >> > have > > >> > > currently bunch of swcs. > > >> > > > > >> > > I am not sure do we need to contact with FDT team ? > > >> > > > > >> > > Alex, > > >> > > > > >> > > After your changes to many swcs in FlexJS - Did you have to change > > >> > process > > >> > > of creation/import new project to FB in some way ? > > >> > > > > >> > > Piotr > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > ----- > > >> > > Apache Flex PMC > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >> > > -- > > >> > > View this message in context: > > >> > > > >> > > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-out- > > >>to-IDE-developers-to-support-FlexJS-tp32656p46277.html > > >> > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > > >>Nabble.com. > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
