Oups, thanks, done !! Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:35:35 +0000 > > Hi Fred, the DebuggableWorker class code looks fine. The file should > probably have an Apache Header instead of what it has now. > > -Alex > > On 5/1/14 6:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >I pushed the commit in the FDBWorkers branch, if you want to have a look > >before I merge it in Develop, that's won't be now but still. > >This is the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34294 if you > >want to check the code via the "Source" tab instead in few minutes. > > > >Thanks for your help ! > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:38:50 +0000 > >> > >> I think core.swc is supposed to contain stuff you can use in AS3 > >>projects > >> w/o pulling in all of the other Flex stuff. Maybe it can go there? > >> > >> On 4/30/14 1:08 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Alex, > >> > > >> >Too much time on it, the reason why it didn't stop in the worker is > >> >because the compiled worker didn't included the base worker class, > >>better > >> >that than what I thought :P > >> > > >> >Also, it's going to work for Flex projects but not for pure AS3 > >>projects > >> >if I put that base class in the existing libs, should we create an > >>other > >> >lib that pure AS3 project could reference ? how do you see it could be > >> >better ? > >> > > >> >Is it a good solution for IDEs ? > >> > > >> >Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >> Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:17:29 +0100 > >> >> > >> >> It is not even that, even if I stop in the main thread, switch to the > >> >>worker and try to stop it, it doesn't want, digging into.... > >> >> > >> >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> >> > >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >> > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> >> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:47:33 +0100 > >> >> > > >> >> > What I did and 1st surprised I thought it was the "halt" command to > >> >>debug, not even, it was in the main loop and the trick is, I had to > >>code > >> >>to stop only on the main thread, it doesn't work with the current > >> >>implementation, well, not so but at the end, given once it is halted > >>we > >> >>can switch to another one, halt it and so on. > >> >> > > >> >> > So, at the IDE point of view, I'm scared that the users can only > >>halt > >> >>in the main thread even using a base Worker and the fix I found, now I > >> >>wonder if we need to raise a bug in the FlashPlayer ? > >> >> > It doesn't answer to the requested message sent to a worker: > >> >>simpleRequestResponseMessageIsolate(DMessage.OutStopDebug, > >> >>DMessage.InBreakAtExt, every, isolateId); > >> >> > > >> >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> >> > > >> >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >> > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> >> > > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:02:01 +0000 > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Looks right. Maybe capabilities.isDebugger isn't true or > >> >>setInterval > >> >> > > doesn't work? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > You've got a new debugger, step through it. ;-) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -Alex > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On 4/30/14 9:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >I created a base class that the workers extend but doesn't seem > >>to > >> >>work, > >> >> > > >did I miss something ? > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >/** > >> >> > > > * User: DoubleFx Date: 30/04/2014 Time: 17:34 > >> >> > > > */ > >> >> > > >package { > >> >> > > >import flash.display.Sprite; > >> >> > > >import flash.system.Capabilities; > >> >> > > >import flash.utils.setInterval; > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >public class DebugWorker extends Sprite { > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > public function DebugWorker() { > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > // Stick a timer here so that we will execute script > >>every > >> >>1.5s > >> >> > > > // no matter what. > >> >> > > > // This is strictly for the debugger to be able to halt. > >> >> > > > // Note: isDebugger is true only with a Debugger Player. > >> >> > > > if (Capabilities.isDebugger == true) { > >> >> > > > setInterval(debugTickler, 1500); > >> >> > > > } > >> >> > > > } > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > /** > >> >> > > > * @private > >> >> > > > * This is here so we get the this pointer set to > >>Application. > >> >> > > > */ > >> >> > > > private function debugTickler():void { > >> >> > > > // We need some bytes of code in order to have a place > >>to > >> >>break. > >> >> > > > var i:int = 0; > >> >> > > > } > >> >> > > >} > >> >> > > >} > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > >> >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> >> > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> >> > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:18:04 +0000 > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> On 4/30/14 8:49 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> >Could be a solution, you meant like the idleTimer in > >> >>SystemManager ? > >> >> > > >> Actually, I was referring to debugTickler in Application.as > >> >>(both mx and > >> >> > > >> spark). > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> -Alex > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
