To keep you in touch of the progress, with those 2 issues [1] [2] fixed we can already debug workers using FDB or IntelliJ for simple cases (1 instance of your Workers), I attached a compiled FDB to the last issue for testing puroposes or if some of you want to play with.
I'm about to allow to set / remove breakpoints on the same file/line in all worker instances in a once when FDB will be launch with the extended worker option (easier to use from an IDE too), I'll keep you in touch as I progress. Frédéric THOMAS [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34332 [2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34333 > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:46:03 +0100 > > Hi guys, > > Just to tell you I open a ticket for AIR > https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3765216 to have the fixes I > did fixed for AIR FDB too, not sure they will do it though. > > I will push the work I did on the develop branch next week if there's no > objections. > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 19:15:23 +0100 > > > > Resolved another issue [1], so, the last FDB is there. > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34297 > > > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > > > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 16:49:30 +0100 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just pushed 2 commits for the issues [1] [2], I would appreciate if > > > someone have time to do more testing, I will add the compiled FDB in few > > > minutes. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34295 > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34296 > > > > > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > > > > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:43:51 +0100 > > > > > > > > Oups, thanks, done !! > > > > > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > > > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > > > > > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:35:35 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > Hi Fred, the DebuggableWorker class code looks fine. The file should > > > > > probably have an Apache Header instead of what it has now. > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > On 5/1/14 6:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > >I pushed the commit in the FDBWorkers branch, if you want to have a > > > > > >look > > > > > >before I merge it in Develop, that's won't be now but still. > > > > > >This is the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34294 if > > > > > >you > > > > > >want to check the code via the "Source" tab instead in few minutes. > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks for your help ! > > > > > > > > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > > > > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:38:50 +0000 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I think core.swc is supposed to contain stuff you can use in AS3 > > > > > >>projects > > > > > >> w/o pulling in all of the other Flex stuff. Maybe it can go there? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 4/30/14 1:08 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >Alex, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >Too much time on it, the reason why it didn't stop in the worker > > > > > >> >is > > > > > >> >because the compiled worker didn't included the base worker class, > > > > > >>better > > > > > >> >that than what I thought :P > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >Also, it's going to work for Flex projects but not for pure AS3 > > > > > >>projects > > > > > >> >if I put that base class in the existing libs, should we create an > > > > > >>other > > > > > >> >lib that pure AS3 project could reference ? how do you see it > > > > > >> >could be > > > > > >> >better ? > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >Is it a good solution for IDEs ? > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > > > > >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > >> >> Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > > > > > >> >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:17:29 +0100 > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> It is not even that, even if I stop in the main thread, switch > > > > > >> >> to the > > > > > >> >>worker and try to stop it, it doesn't want, digging into.... > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > > > > >> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > >> >> > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > > > > > >> >> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:47:33 +0100 > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > What I did and 1st surprised I thought it was the "halt" > > > > > >> >> > command to > > > > > >> >>debug, not even, it was in the main loop and the trick is, I had > > > > > >> >>to > > > > > >>code > > > > > >> >>to stop only on the main thread, it doesn't work with the current > > > > > >> >>implementation, well, not so but at the end, given once it is > > > > > >> >>halted > > > > > >>we > > > > > >> >>can switch to another one, halt it and so on. > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > So, at the IDE point of view, I'm scared that the users can > > > > > >> >> > only > > > > > >>halt > > > > > >> >>in the main thread even using a base Worker and the fix I found, > > > > > >> >>now I > > > > > >> >>wonder if we need to raise a bug in the FlashPlayer ? > > > > > >> >> > It doesn't answer to the requested message sent to a worker: > > > > > >> >>simpleRequestResponseMessageIsolate(DMessage.OutStopDebug, > > > > > >> >>DMessage.InBreakAtExt, every, isolateId); > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > > > > >> >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > >> >> > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > > > > > >> >> > > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:02:01 +0000 > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > Looks right. Maybe capabilities.isDebugger isn't true or > > > > > >> >>setInterval > > > > > >> >> > > doesn't work? > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > You've got a new debugger, step through it. ;-) > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > -Alex > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > On 4/30/14 9:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > > > > > >> >> > > <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > > > > >> >>wrote: > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >I created a base class that the workers extend but doesn't > > > > > >> >> > > >seem > > > > > >>to > > > > > >> >>work, > > > > > >> >> > > >did I miss something ? > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >/** > > > > > >> >> > > > * User: DoubleFx Date: 30/04/2014 Time: 17:34 > > > > > >> >> > > > */ > > > > > >> >> > > >package { > > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.display.Sprite; > > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.system.Capabilities; > > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.utils.setInterval; > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >public class DebugWorker extends Sprite { > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > public function DebugWorker() { > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > // Stick a timer here so that we will execute > > > > > >> >> > > > script > > > > > >>every > > > > > >> >>1.5s > > > > > >> >> > > > // no matter what. > > > > > >> >> > > > // This is strictly for the debugger to be able to > > > > > >> >> > > > halt. > > > > > >> >> > > > // Note: isDebugger is true only with a Debugger > > > > > >> >> > > > Player. > > > > > >> >> > > > if (Capabilities.isDebugger == true) { > > > > > >> >> > > > setInterval(debugTickler, 1500); > > > > > >> >> > > > } > > > > > >> >> > > > } > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > /** > > > > > >> >> > > > * @private > > > > > >> >> > > > * This is here so we get the this pointer set to > > > > > >>Application. > > > > > >> >> > > > */ > > > > > >> >> > > > private function debugTickler():void { > > > > > >> >> > > > // We need some bytes of code in order to have a > > > > > >> >> > > > place > > > > > >>to > > > > > >> >>break. > > > > > >> >> > > > var i:int = 0; > > > > > >> >> > > > } > > > > > >> >> > > >} > > > > > >> >> > > >} > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > > > > > >> >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > >> >> > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > > > > > >> >> > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:18:04 +0000 > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> On 4/30/14 8:49 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > > > > >> >>wrote: > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> >Could be a solution, you meant like the idleTimer in > > > > > >> >>SystemManager ? > > > > > >> >> > > >> Actually, I was referring to debugTickler in > > > > > >> >> > > >> Application.as > > > > > >> >>(both mx and > > > > > >> >> > > >> spark). > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> -Alex > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
