FYI, looking at the pratical usage on IDEs, I changed my mind relative to the fact that breaking in all instances shouldn't be the default behavior, until nobody has objections, I will then implement the default behavior as breaking in all existed and newly created instances of a worker, anyway, I add the possibility to indicate the worker id inb the break / clear commands, in that case, the function will be applied on the worker id only (aka the instance of the worker), an other option to touch a particular breakpoint will be to use delete break <BP NUMBER>, the commands will be smart enought to let you do without to change the active worker.
Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 04:01:05 +0000 > > Awesome! > > On 5/24/14 6:12 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >To keep you in touch of the progress, with those 2 issues [1] [2] fixed > >we can already debug workers using FDB or IntelliJ for simple cases (1 > >instance of your Workers), I attached a compiled FDB to the last issue > >for testing puroposes or if some of you want to play with. > > > >I'm about to allow to set / remove breakpoints on the same file/line in > >all worker instances in a once when FDB will be launch with the extended > >worker option (easier to use from an IDE too), I'll keep you in touch as > >I progress. > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34332 > >[2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34333 > > > > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:46:03 +0100 > >> > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> Just to tell you I open a ticket for AIR > >>https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3765216 to have the > >>fixes I did fixed for AIR FDB too, not sure they will do it though. > >> > >> I will push the work I did on the develop branch next week if there's > >>no objections. > >> > >> > >> > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 19:15:23 +0100 > >> > > >> > Resolved another issue [1], so, the last FDB is there. > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34297 > >> > > >> > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> > > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 16:49:30 +0100 > >> > > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > I just pushed 2 commits for the issues [1] [2], I would appreciate > >>if someone have time to do more testing, I will add the compiled FDB in > >>few minutes. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34295 > >> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34296 > >> > > > >> > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:43:51 +0100 > >> > > > > >> > > > Oups, thanks, done !! > >> > > > > >> > > > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > >> > > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:35:35 +0000 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Fred, the DebuggableWorker class code looks fine. The file > >>should > >> > > > > probably have an Apache Header instead of what it has now. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -Alex > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 5/1/14 6:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Alex, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >I pushed the commit in the FDBWorkers branch, if you want to > >>have a look > >> > > > > >before I merge it in Develop, that's won't be now but still. > >> > > > > >This is the JIRA > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34294 if you > >> > > > > >want to check the code via the "Source" tab instead in few > >>minutes. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >Thanks for your help ! > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:38:50 +0000 > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> I think core.swc is supposed to contain stuff you can use in > >>AS3 > >> > > > > >>projects > >> > > > > >> w/o pulling in all of the other Flex stuff. Maybe it can go > >>there? > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> On 4/30/14 1:08 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >Alex, > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >Too much time on it, the reason why it didn't stop in the > >>worker is > >> > > > > >> >because the compiled worker didn't included the base worker > >>class, > >> > > > > >>better > >> > > > > >> >that than what I thought :P > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >Also, it's going to work for Flex projects but not for pure > >>AS3 > >> > > > > >>projects > >> > > > > >> >if I put that base class in the existing libs, should we > >>create an > >> > > > > >>other > >> > > > > >> >lib that pure AS3 project could reference ? how do you see > >>it could be > >> > > > > >> >better ? > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >Is it a good solution for IDEs ? > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > > > >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > > >> >> Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > > >> >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:17:29 +0100 > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> It is not even that, even if I stop in the main thread, > >>switch to the > >> > > > > >> >>worker and try to stop it, it doesn't want, digging > >>into.... > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > > > >> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > > >> >> > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > > >> >> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:47:33 +0100 > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > What I did and 1st surprised I thought it was the > >>"halt" command to > >> > > > > >> >>debug, not even, it was in the main loop and the trick is, > >>I had to > >> > > > > >>code > >> > > > > >> >>to stop only on the main thread, it doesn't work with the > >>current > >> > > > > >> >>implementation, well, not so but at the end, given once it > >>is halted > >> > > > > >>we > >> > > > > >> >>can switch to another one, halt it and so on. > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > So, at the IDE point of view, I'm scared that the users > >>can only > >> > > > > >>halt > >> > > > > >> >>in the main thread even using a base Worker and the fix I > >>found, now I > >> > > > > >> >>wonder if we need to raise a bug in the FlashPlayer ? > >> > > > > >> >> > It doesn't answer to the requested message sent to a > >>worker: > >> > > > > >> >>simpleRequestResponseMessageIsolate(DMessage.OutStopDebug, > >> > > > > >> >>DMessage.InBreakAtExt, every, isolateId); > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > > > >> >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > > >> >> > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > > >> >> > > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:02:01 +0000 > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > Looks right. Maybe capabilities.isDebugger isn't > >>true or > >> > > > > >> >>setInterval > >> > > > > >> >> > > doesn't work? > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > You've got a new debugger, step through it. ;-) > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > -Alex > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > On 4/30/14 9:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> > > > > >> >>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >I created a base class that the workers extend but > >>doesn't seem > >> > > > > >>to > >> > > > > >> >>work, > >> > > > > >> >> > > >did I miss something ? > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >/** > >> > > > > >> >> > > > * User: DoubleFx Date: 30/04/2014 Time: 17:34 > >> > > > > >> >> > > > */ > >> > > > > >> >> > > >package { > >> > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.display.Sprite; > >> > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.system.Capabilities; > >> > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.utils.setInterval; > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >public class DebugWorker extends Sprite { > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > public function DebugWorker() { > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > // Stick a timer here so that we will > >>execute script > >> > > > > >>every > >> > > > > >> >>1.5s > >> > > > > >> >> > > > // no matter what. > >> > > > > >> >> > > > // This is strictly for the debugger to be > >>able to halt. > >> > > > > >> >> > > > // Note: isDebugger is true only with a > >>Debugger Player. > >> > > > > >> >> > > > if (Capabilities.isDebugger == true) { > >> > > > > >> >> > > > setInterval(debugTickler, 1500); > >> > > > > >> >> > > > } > >> > > > > >> >> > > > } > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > /** > >> > > > > >> >> > > > * @private > >> > > > > >> >> > > > * This is here so we get the this pointer set > >>to > >> > > > > >>Application. > >> > > > > >> >> > > > */ > >> > > > > >> >> > > > private function debugTickler():void { > >> > > > > >> >> > > > // We need some bytes of code in order to > >>have a place > >> > > > > >>to > >> > > > > >> >>break. > >> > > > > >> >> > > > var i:int = 0; > >> > > > > >> >> > > > } > >> > > > > >> >> > > >} > >> > > > > >> >> > > >} > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:18:04 +0000 > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> On 4/30/14 8:49 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >> > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> > > > > >> >>wrote: > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >Could be a solution, you meant like the idleTimer > >>in > >> > > > > >> >>SystemManager ? > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Actually, I was referring to debugTickler in > >>Application.as > >> > > > > >> >>(both mx and > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> spark). > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> -Alex > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
