Awesome! On 5/24/14 6:12 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>To keep you in touch of the progress, with those 2 issues [1] [2] fixed >we can already debug workers using FDB or IntelliJ for simple cases (1 >instance of your Workers), I attached a compiled FDB to the last issue >for testing puroposes or if some of you want to play with. > >I'm about to allow to set / remove breakpoints on the same file/line in >all worker instances in a once when FDB will be launch with the extended >worker option (easier to use from an IDE too), I'll keep you in touch as >I progress. > >Frédéric THOMAS > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34332 >[2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34333 > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration >> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:46:03 +0100 >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Just to tell you I open a ticket for AIR >>https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3765216 to have the >>fixes I did fixed for AIR FDB too, not sure they will do it though. >> >> I will push the work I did on the develop branch next week if there's >>no objections. >> >> >> >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration >> > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 19:15:23 +0100 >> > >> > Resolved another issue [1], so, the last FDB is there. >> > >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34297 >> > >> > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration >> > > Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 16:49:30 +0100 >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I just pushed 2 commits for the issues [1] [2], I would appreciate >>if someone have time to do more testing, I will add the compiled FDB in >>few minutes. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34295 >> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34296 >> > > >> > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration >> > > > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:43:51 +0100 >> > > > >> > > > Oups, thanks, done !! >> > > > >> > > > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > >> > > > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration >> > > > > Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:35:35 +0000 >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Fred, the DebuggableWorker class code looks fine. The file >>should >> > > > > probably have an Apache Header instead of what it has now. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Alex >> > > > > >> > > > > On 5/1/14 6:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > >Alex, >> > > > > > >> > > > > >I pushed the commit in the FDBWorkers branch, if you want to >>have a look >> > > > > >before I merge it in Develop, that's won't be now but still. >> > > > > >This is the JIRA >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34294 if you >> > > > > >want to check the code via the "Source" tab instead in few >>minutes. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Thanks for your help ! >> > > > > > >> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration >> > > > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:38:50 +0000 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I think core.swc is supposed to contain stuff you can use in >>AS3 >> > > > > >>projects >> > > > > >> w/o pulling in all of the other Flex stuff. Maybe it can go >>there? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> On 4/30/14 1:08 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >Alex, >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >Too much time on it, the reason why it didn't stop in the >>worker is >> > > > > >> >because the compiled worker didn't included the base worker >>class, >> > > > > >>better >> > > > > >> >that than what I thought :P >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >Also, it's going to work for Flex projects but not for pure >>AS3 >> > > > > >>projects >> > > > > >> >if I put that base class in the existing libs, should we >>create an >> > > > > >>other >> > > > > >> >lib that pure AS3 project could reference ? how do you see >>it could be >> > > > > >> >better ? >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >Is it a good solution for IDEs ? >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > > > >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> >> Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration >> > > > > >> >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:17:29 +0100 >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> It is not even that, even if I stop in the main thread, >>switch to the >> > > > > >> >>worker and try to stop it, it doesn't want, digging >>into.... >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > > > >> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> >> > Subject: RE: [FDB] Integration >> > > > > >> >> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:47:33 +0100 >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > What I did and 1st surprised I thought it was the >>"halt" command to >> > > > > >> >>debug, not even, it was in the main loop and the trick is, >>I had to >> > > > > >>code >> > > > > >> >>to stop only on the main thread, it doesn't work with the >>current >> > > > > >> >>implementation, well, not so but at the end, given once it >>is halted >> > > > > >>we >> > > > > >> >>can switch to another one, halt it and so on. >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > So, at the IDE point of view, I'm scared that the users >>can only >> > > > > >>halt >> > > > > >> >>in the main thread even using a base Worker and the fix I >>found, now I >> > > > > >> >>wonder if we need to raise a bug in the FlashPlayer ? >> > > > > >> >> > It doesn't answer to the requested message sent to a >>worker: >> > > > > >> >>simpleRequestResponseMessageIsolate(DMessage.OutStopDebug, >> > > > > >> >>DMessage.InBreakAtExt, every, isolateId); >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > > > >> >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> >> > > Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration >> > > > > >> >> > > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:02:01 +0000 >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > Looks right. Maybe capabilities.isDebugger isn't >>true or >> > > > > >> >>setInterval >> > > > > >> >> > > doesn't work? >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > You've got a new debugger, step through it. ;-) >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > -Alex >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > On 4/30/14 9:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > > > >> >>wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >I created a base class that the workers extend but >>doesn't seem >> > > > > >>to >> > > > > >> >>work, >> > > > > >> >> > > >did I miss something ? >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >/** >> > > > > >> >> > > > * User: DoubleFx Date: 30/04/2014 Time: 17:34 >> > > > > >> >> > > > */ >> > > > > >> >> > > >package { >> > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.display.Sprite; >> > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.system.Capabilities; >> > > > > >> >> > > >import flash.utils.setInterval; >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >public class DebugWorker extends Sprite { >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > public function DebugWorker() { >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > // Stick a timer here so that we will >>execute script >> > > > > >>every >> > > > > >> >>1.5s >> > > > > >> >> > > > // no matter what. >> > > > > >> >> > > > // This is strictly for the debugger to be >>able to halt. >> > > > > >> >> > > > // Note: isDebugger is true only with a >>Debugger Player. >> > > > > >> >> > > > if (Capabilities.isDebugger == true) { >> > > > > >> >> > > > setInterval(debugTickler, 1500); >> > > > > >> >> > > > } >> > > > > >> >> > > > } >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > /** >> > > > > >> >> > > > * @private >> > > > > >> >> > > > * This is here so we get the this pointer set >>to >> > > > > >>Application. >> > > > > >> >> > > > */ >> > > > > >> >> > > > private function debugTickler():void { >> > > > > >> >> > > > // We need some bytes of code in order to >>have a place >> > > > > >>to >> > > > > >> >>break. >> > > > > >> >> > > > var i:int = 0; >> > > > > >> >> > > > } >> > > > > >> >> > > >} >> > > > > >> >> > > >} >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > > > >> >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Subject: Re: [FDB] Integration >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:18:04 +0000 >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> On 4/30/14 8:49 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >> > > > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > > > >> >>wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >Could be a solution, you meant like the idleTimer >>in >> > > > > >> >>SystemManager ? >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Actually, I was referring to debugTickler in >>Application.as >> > > > > >> >>(both mx and >> > > > > >> >> > > >> spark). >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> -Alex >> > > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
