On 11/8/2019 9:12 AM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com> >> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 14:35 >> To: john.mcnam...@intel.com; marko.kovace...@intel.com; >> nhor...@tuxdriver.com; ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com; >> somnath.ko...@broadcom.com; anatoly.bura...@intel.com; >> xuanziya...@huawei.com; cloud.wangxiao...@huawei.com; >> zhouguoy...@huawei.com; wenzhuo...@intel.com; >> konstantin.anan...@intel.com; Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>; >> Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>; Slava Ovsiienko >> <viachesl...@mellanox.com>; rm...@marvell.com; >> shsha...@marvell.com; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; >> tiwei....@intel.com; zhihong.w...@intel.com; yongw...@vmware.com; >> Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; >> arybche...@solarflare.com; jingjing...@intel.com; >> bernard.iremon...@intel.com >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] net/mlx5: use API to set max LRO packet size >> >> This patch implements use of the API for LRO aggregated packet max size. >> Rx queue create is updated to use the relevant configuration. >> Documentation is updated accordingly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com> > Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viachesl...@mellanox.com> >
This is an ethdev level API change, that will affect multiple PMDs, shouldn't we get more input than single company?
