So I checked the config for dev@community and it is set up as a normal dev@ list operates.
Therefore anyone can subscribe to the list and post. The only thing we can do here is change it to subscription moderation - that is an on|off switch so therefore ALL subscription requests will have to be approved by a moderator. If you are ok with that I can make the change . I checked the logs and it looks like a mod has removed the subscription for the user in this thread. Let me know, Gav… > On 17 Aug 2015, at 9:48 am, Ross Gardler <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > Not sure if it's possible (you reply made me think I may be mixing up Google > Groups features with our lists) > > Sent from my Windows Phone > From: jan i <mailto:j...@apache.org> > Sent: 8/17/2015 1:44 AM > To: dev@community.apache.org <mailto:dev@community.apache.org> > Cc: Roman Shaposhnik <mailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org>; Apache Infrastructure > <mailto:infrastruct...@apache.org> > Subject: Re: What is the legal basis for enforcing release policies at ASF? > > On 17 August 2015 at 10:24, Ross Gardler <ross.gard...@microsoft.com > <mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com>> wrote: > > > Moderating first posts would be better. > > > +1 to that solution (did not know that was possible), that way the > moderators to not get overloaded with work. > > Alternative would be to allow apache ID, and moderate others. > > rgds > jan i. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com <mailto:seb...@gmail.com>] > > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 1:22 AM > > To: Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org <mailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org>> > > Cc: ComDev <dev@community.apache.org <mailto:dev@community.apache.org>>; > > Apache Infrastructure < > > infrastruct...@apache.org <mailto:infrastruct...@apache.org>> > > Subject: Re: What is the legal basis for enforcing release policies at ASF? > > > > This is a new subscription (send an e-mail to dev-log@community.a.o > > <mailto:dev-log@community.a.o> for > > details) > > > > Perhaps we need to consider moderated subscriptions for this list. > > > > On 16 August 2015 at 21:33, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org > > <mailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org>> wrote: > > > This email echoing keeps happening. I thought we've dealt with it, no? > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: 田義忠 <name0905189...@icloud.com <mailto:name0905189...@icloud.com>> > > > Date: Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 1:27 PM > > > Subject: Re: What is the legal basis for enforcing release policies at > > ASF? > > > To: "dev@community.apache.org <mailto:dev@community.apache.org>" > > > <dev@community.apache.org <mailto:dev@community.apache.org>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 從我的 iPhone 傳送 > > > > > >> Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org <mailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org>> 於 > > >> 2015年8月17日 04:25 寫道： > > >> > > >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org > > >>> <mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org>> > > wrote: > > >>>> On 8/7/15 7:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > >>>> Bill, > > >>>> So I can release "Niclas Hadoop platform, based on Apache Hadoop" > > >>>> ?? I thought the discussion a few years ago was that this was > > misleading... > > >>> > > >>> No, you cannot. See our actual trademark policy: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww > > >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww> > > >>> .apache.org > > >>> <http://apache.org/>%2ffoundation%2fmarks%2ffaq%2f%23products&data=01%7c01%7c > > >>> ross.gardler%40microsoft.com > > >>> <http://40microsoft.com/>%7c53be77cdd3ef4dca285308d2a6dced17%7c72 > > >>> f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=DdcuJh%2bbhphaiy7yoW%2f2caG > > >>> y15TIxfrsXg1V%2fHh9Jsg%3d > > >>> > > >>> Our release policy, as Roman originally asked about, applies only to > > >>> ASF projects, and has no bearing on third parties. However our > > >>> trademark policy, and trademark law, prevents third parties from > > >>> publicly providing software using our trademarks. > > >>> > > >>> Our operational policies only apply to our projects, just like any > > >>> other corporation. Some policies, like our license itself and our > > >>> formal trademark policy, inform the rest of the world how they are > > >>> allowed to use our websites, software code, and brands. > > >>> > > >>> Make sense? > > >> > > >> It does, but our relationships with downstream Linux vendors (just to > > >> take the most obvious example) set a very confusing precedent. > > >> > > >> Shane, if would be super helpful if you took a look at: > > >> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpkgs.org%2fsearch%2fhadoop&data=01%7c01%7cross.gardler%40microsoft.com%7c53be77cdd3ef4dca285308d2a6dced17%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ZXiKGbcB8ekfCts3JOcHVPYpX35xcqfr87Adbmf77%2f8%3d > > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpkgs.org%2fsearch%2fhadoop&data=01%7c01%7cross.gardler%40microsoft.com%7c53be77cdd3ef4dca285308d2a6dced17%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ZXiKGbcB8ekfCts3JOcHVPYpX35xcqfr87Adbmf77%2f8%3d> > > >> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpkgs.org%2fsearch%2fmaven&data=01%7c01%7cross.gardler%40microsoft.com%7c53be77cdd3ef4dca285308d2a6dced17%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=bbku3kk8GRT8rNXWo5gwhRfpWIOoouH%2buNNzmrCpI0I%3d > > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpkgs.org%2fsearch%2fmaven&data=01%7c01%7cross.gardler%40microsoft.com%7c53be77cdd3ef4dca285308d2a6dced17%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=bbku3kk8GRT8rNXWo5gwhRfpWIOoouH%2buNNzmrCpI0I%3d> > > >> > > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpkgs > > >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpkgs>. > > >> org%2fsearch%2fsubversion&data=01%7c01%7cross.gardler%40microsoft.com > > >> <http://40microsoft.com/> > > >> %7c53be77cdd3ef4dca285308d2a6dced17%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db4 > > >> 7%7c1&sdata=BEHyTF%2b6dOsaARgvSX3%2bp1gWPkiVjbg7wODXVv2tzA8%3d > > >> and pubished your narrative of how the ASF branding policies apply in > > >> both cases. > > >> > > >> The 3 projects I'm picking represent a pretty diverse set of cases of > > >> how PMCs are conducting themselves. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Roman. > > Gav... ( ( ( ( )\ ) )\ ) )\ ) ( ) ) )\ (()/((()/( (()/( )\ ) ( ) ( /( ( ( ( /( ( ( ( ((((_)( /(_))/(_)) /(_)) ( (()/( )( ( /( ( )\()))( ))\ ( )\()) ))\ )( ))\ )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_)) )\ ) /(_))(()\ )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\ /((_) )\ (_))/ /((_)(()\ /((_) (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_ |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_ ((_)(_))( ((_)| |_ (_))( ((_)(_)) / _ \ \__ \| __| | | | ' \))| _|| '_|/ _` |(_-<| _|| '_|| || |/ _| | _|| || || '_|/ -_) /_/ \_\ |___/|_| |___||_||_| |_| |_| \__,_|/__/ \__||_| \_,_|\__| \__| \_,_||_| \___|
