I am +1 on using git but I won't be able to help with the changes that will need to be made so I am voting +0.
FWIW, I don't think git really "solves" anything. It will fix a perception problem and it will make it easier to do distributed development. Ralph On Oct 10, 2013, at 8:06 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/10/2013 15:50, James Carman wrote: >> All, >> >> We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I >> think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: >> >> +1 - yes, move to Git >> -1 - no, do not move to Git >> >> The vote will be left open for 72 hours. Go! > > -1. I'm not convinced that the implications have been fully thought > through (the web site has to remain on svn for example) nor that this > migration will solve the problems it aims to solve. > > I'd be much happier with doing a trial with one component first before > starting a wholesale migration. > > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
