Le 10/10/2013 19:27, Damjan Jovanovic a écrit : > -1 (binding), it's a big change, so let's try Mark's idea of one > component first.
+1. I see a lot of advantages. The first one is in branches merging which could help for experimental stuff, the second is in getting contributions (for example large ones like that of Evan), and the third is in the use tooling. But I also agree a first step with one component would be easier for most people. Git is not simple to learn. Luc > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 15:50, James Carman wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> We have had some great discussions about moving our SCM to Git. I >>> think it's time to put it to a vote. So, here we go: >>> >>> +1 - yes, move to Git >>> -1 - no, do not move to Git >>> >>> The vote will be left open for 72 hours. Go! >> >> -1. I'm not convinced that the implications have been fully thought >> through (the web site has to remain on svn for example) nor that this >> migration will solve the problems it aims to solve. >> >> I'd be much happier with doing a trial with one component first before >> starting a wholesale migration. >> >> Mark >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
