On 5/18/11 2:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >>> On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe<luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: >>>>> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? >>>> >>>> Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ... >> >> Because it is easier to read, I would go for this one if it >> weren't advised >> against in the Java world (for some reason unknown to me). >> >>> In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are >>> scrunched >>> together, giving oned, twod, threed. >> >> Indeed, habit (in Java) would dictate to use this one... > > OK, I can do this. > I let a few hours pass in case someone else wants to comment on > this, because I would not like to change it back to something else > several times (it has side effects on some other projects).
+1 for oned, twod, threed Phil > > Luc > >> >> >> Regards, >> Gilles >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org