On 5/18/11 2:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>> On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe<luc.maison...@free.fr>  wrote:
>>>>> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ?
>>>>
>>>> Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ...
>>
>> Because it is easier to read, I would go for this one if it
>> weren't advised
>> against in the Java world (for some reason unknown to me).
>>
>>> In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are
>>> scrunched
>>> together, giving oned, twod, threed.
>>
>> Indeed, habit (in Java) would dictate to use this one...
>
> OK, I can do this.
> I let a few hours pass in case someone else wants to comment on
> this, because I would not like to change it back to something else
> several times (it has side effects on some other projects).

+1 for oned, twod, threed

Phil
>
> Luc
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gilles
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to