On 5/14/11 2:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hello, > > Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, > Apache Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see > the thread about this creation here: > <http://markmail.org/thread/mcg23trgtl472ica>). > > Thinking further about it, I would like to directly merge it into > [math]. We are creating a new major release for [math], so it may > be a good time to do so. Also as I changed the code to put it in > sandbox, in fact I already did all the necessary work to have a > working implementation, with tests and clean reports from > checkstyle and findbugs. The implementation is complete for > dimensions 1, 2 and 3 in Cartesian space. I also need an > implementation on spherical geometry but I can do that regardless > of the component hosting this package. So the component could be > promoted and it really makes sense to have it inside [math]. > > It could be put as a bsp package at top level (alongside with > geometry, analysis, ode ...). > > Does this suggestion makes sense ?
+1 to integrate this code into [math]. I don't think we need anything beyond lazy consensus to do this, since we are not creating a Commons proper component here. Lets just give others a little while to weigh in. I am on the fence re top level package vs subpackage of geometry, leaning toward the latter. Why would you consider it as not a natural part of geometry? Phil > Luc > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
