On 5/14/11 7:28 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Luc, > >> package. So the component could be promoted and it really makes >> sense >> to have it inside [math]. > > Over the past several months, I read endless discussions regarding > some > 'philosophical' questions (e.g. on exceptions) affecting > commons-math, > all delaying the relaese of 2.2. Unless one first adopts a clear > poli- > tical procedure as far as changes are concerned (especially those > affec- > ting the way of coding rather than bug fixed), I fear that making > math > bigger, with this new component, will only add its set of endless > back-and-forth discussions. > > For the time being, I am -1.
Sorry, Dmitri, but that is not an acceptable "veto" from the ASF perspective. When you say "-1" to a technical (code-related) change, you need to provide a technical reason to support your veto. Do you have technical problems with the code being proposed for inclusion? Phil > > Regards, > Dim. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dimitri Pourbaix * > Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * Don't worry, be happy > CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * and CARPE DIEM. > Universite Libre de Bruxelles * > Boulevard du Triomphe * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71 > B-1050 Bruxelles * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26 > http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * > mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
