+1
>From me as well.
Den 18/05/2011 22.22 skrev "Phil Steitz" <phil.ste...@gmail.com>:
> On 5/18/11 2:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>>> On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe<luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote:
>>>>>> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ...
>>>
>>> Because it is easier to read, I would go for this one if it
>>> weren't advised
>>> against in the Java world (for some reason unknown to me).
>>>
>>>> In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are
>>>> scrunched
>>>> together, giving oned, twod, threed.
>>>
>>> Indeed, habit (in Java) would dictate to use this one...
>>
>> OK, I can do this.
>> I let a few hours pass in case someone else wants to comment on
>> this, because I would not like to change it back to something else
>> several times (it has side effects on some other projects).
>
> +1 for oned, twod, threed
>
> Phil
>>
>> Luc
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
