Le 18/05/2011 11:49, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe<luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote:
Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ?
Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ...
Because it is easier to read, I would go for this one if it weren't advised
against in the Java world (for some reason unknown to me).
In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are scrunched
together, giving oned, twod, threed.
Indeed, habit (in Java) would dictate to use this one...
OK, I can do this.
I let a few hours pass in case someone else wants to comment on this,
because I would not like to change it back to something else several
times (it has side effects on some other projects).
Luc
Regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
