On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > On 18 May 2011 09:11, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: > >> Should I replace with one-d, two-d and three-d ? > > > > Of course this should read: one_d, two_d and three_d ...
Because it is easier to read, I would go for this one if it weren't advised against in the Java world (for some reason unknown to me). > In the variety of Java source I've seen, multiple words are scrunched > together, giving oned, twod, threed. Indeed, habit (in Java) would dictate to use this one... Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
