Ok, it's already changed in trunk. If we come up with a good reason to change it back, we can do so easily.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 too. > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I was -1, but the below is a good argument. +1. >> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, James Carman >> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >> > Well, I think changing the artifactId right now would be the way to >> > go. That keeps things consistent. If we move to org.apache.commons >> > groupId now and don't change the artifactId and then later, if we >> > release 4.x, we change the package to lang4 and the artifactId to >> > commons-lang4 it will just be rather inconsistent. I move for >> > changing it to commons-lang3. >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> We don't need the artifact name to necessarily contain the version name >> >> since the group is different. We already have achieved parallel installs >> >> just by doing that. >> >> >> >> I see two choices for the FQN: >> >> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.0-beta-1 >> >> org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0-beta-1 >> >> >> >> Which do you favor? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, James Carman < >> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >> >> >> >>> Yes, it's >> >>> >> >>> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > And we have abandoned commons-lang as the groupId, right? >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:57 PM, James Carman < >> >>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> Ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't off base here. Want me to >> >>> >> commit it (it's change on my local)? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Paul Benedict < >> pbened...@apache.org> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > +1. One goal that Henri and I believed in is side-by-side / casual >> >>> >> migration >> >>> >> > of code. You can't do that with the same artifactId. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, James Carman < >> >>> >> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> All, >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Changing the package name helps, but I think we need to also >> change >> >>> >> >> the artifactId so that when folks are using maven, they can have >> both >> >>> >> >> lang3 and older versions on the classpath at the same time. >> >>> Thoughts? >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> James >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
