Henri, Since I srewed everything up (artifactId, EventListenerSupport, etc.), do you want me to re-cut the 3.0-beta release? I think we should try to make sure all this is fixed before we "release" a beta.
James On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was -1, but the below is a good argument. +1. > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, James Carman > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >> Well, I think changing the artifactId right now would be the way to >> go. That keeps things consistent. If we move to org.apache.commons >> groupId now and don't change the artifactId and then later, if we >> release 4.x, we change the package to lang4 and the artifactId to >> commons-lang4 it will just be rather inconsistent. I move for >> changing it to commons-lang3. >> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >>> We don't need the artifact name to necessarily contain the version name >>> since the group is different. We already have achieved parallel installs >>> just by doing that. >>> >>> I see two choices for the FQN: >>> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.0-beta-1 >>> org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0-beta-1 >>> >>> Which do you favor? >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, James Carman >>> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, it's >>>> >>>> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > And we have abandoned commons-lang as the groupId, right? >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:57 PM, James Carman < >>>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't off base here. Want me to >>>> >> commit it (it's change on my local)? >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > +1. One goal that Henri and I believed in is side-by-side / casual >>>> >> migration >>>> >> > of code. You can't do that with the same artifactId. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, James Carman < >>>> >> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> All, >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Changing the package name helps, but I think we need to also change >>>> >> >> the artifactId so that when folks are using maven, they can have both >>>> >> >> lang3 and older versions on the classpath at the same time. >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Thanks, >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> James >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
