And we have abandoned commons-lang as the groupId, right? On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:57 PM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote:
> Ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't off base here. Want me to > commit it (it's change on my local)? > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1. One goal that Henri and I believed in is side-by-side / casual > migration > > of code. You can't do that with the same artifactId. > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, James Carman < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> Changing the package name helps, but I think we need to also change > >> the artifactId so that when folks are using maven, they can have both > >> lang3 and older versions on the classpath at the same time. Thoughts? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> James > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
