I was -1, but the below is a good argument. +1. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > Well, I think changing the artifactId right now would be the way to > go. That keeps things consistent. If we move to org.apache.commons > groupId now and don't change the artifactId and then later, if we > release 4.x, we change the package to lang4 and the artifactId to > commons-lang4 it will just be rather inconsistent. I move for > changing it to commons-lang3. > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> We don't need the artifact name to necessarily contain the version name >> since the group is different. We already have achieved parallel installs >> just by doing that. >> >> I see two choices for the FQN: >> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.0-beta-1 >> org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0-beta-1 >> >> Which do you favor? >> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, James Carman >> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >> >>> Yes, it's >>> >>> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > And we have abandoned commons-lang as the groupId, right? >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:57 PM, James Carman < >>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >>> > >>> >> Ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't off base here. Want me to >>> >> commit it (it's change on my local)? >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > +1. One goal that Henri and I believed in is side-by-side / casual >>> >> migration >>> >> > of code. You can't do that with the same artifactId. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, James Carman < >>> >> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> All, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Changing the package name helps, but I think we need to also change >>> >> >> the artifactId so that when folks are using maven, they can have both >>> >> >> lang3 and older versions on the classpath at the same time. >>> Thoughts? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> James >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
