Ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't off base here. Want me to commit it (it's change on my local)?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. One goal that Henri and I believed in is side-by-side / casual migration > of code. You can't do that with the same artifactId. > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, James Carman > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> All, >> >> Changing the package name helps, but I think we need to also change >> the artifactId so that when folks are using maven, they can have both >> lang3 and older versions on the classpath at the same time. Thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> >> James >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
