+1 too. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was -1, but the below is a good argument. +1. > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, James Carman > <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > > Well, I think changing the artifactId right now would be the way to > > go. That keeps things consistent. If we move to org.apache.commons > > groupId now and don't change the artifactId and then later, if we > > release 4.x, we change the package to lang4 and the artifactId to > > commons-lang4 it will just be rather inconsistent. I move for > > changing it to commons-lang3. > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> We don't need the artifact name to necessarily contain the version name > >> since the group is different. We already have achieved parallel installs > >> just by doing that. > >> > >> I see two choices for the FQN: > >> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.0-beta-1 > >> org.apache.commons:commons-lang:3.0-beta-1 > >> > >> Which do you favor? > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, James Carman < > ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, it's > >>> > >>> org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > And we have abandoned commons-lang as the groupId, right? > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:57 PM, James Carman < > >>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Ok, just wanted to make sure I wasn't off base here. Want me to > >>> >> commit it (it's change on my local)? > >>> >> > >>> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Paul Benedict < > pbened...@apache.org> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > +1. One goal that Henri and I believed in is side-by-side / casual > >>> >> migration > >>> >> > of code. You can't do that with the same artifactId. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, James Carman < > >>> >> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> All, > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Changing the package name helps, but I think we need to also > change > >>> >> >> the artifactId so that when folks are using maven, they can have > both > >>> >> >> lang3 and older versions on the classpath at the same time. > >>> Thoughts? > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Thanks, > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> James > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
