James Carman a écrit : > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have >> not done that in this case. My original vote (+1) was partly for >> consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell" >> scenarios. I was swayed by Niall's argument and reflection on use cases >> that I am aware of. I am sure Niall as well is open to enlightenment if >> others can point to practical use cases (observed or likely) involving >> [math] that demonstrate that the "pain-minimizing" alternative is to change >> the package name. > > Didn't someone say that math already had a "jar hell" situation > encountered by users?
I said that. In fact it was not an unsolvable case because the concerned project has control on the intermediate dependency. The people in charge were also against the package name change. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
