Rahul Akolkar a écrit : > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >> (apologies for jumping in half way through) >> >> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes >>> that have been done on >>> [math] for the last months belong to the major changes with large >>> incompatibilities with previous versions. >>> We have already decided that the version number will be 2.0 to acknowledge >>> that. I know of at least one big >>> international research project that uses commons-math 1.2 and will switch >>> to 2.0 when it will be published. >>> They have already faced compatibility problems recently (two days ago). >>> >>> Should we change the top level package name from org.apache.commons.math to >>> org.apache.commons.math2 ? >> why not org.apache.math ;-) >> >> maybe the time and interest levels are now right to consider a TLP... >> > <snip/> > > I'd support such a resolution if and when the [math] developers deem it fit.
This is tempting ... The pros: There is currently some momentum in [math] and several people seem interested. There are also several other mathematical projects floating around and apparently ready to cooperate. The component is becoming quite large by now and its focus slightly shifts away from the rest of the commons components. The cons: Maybe the current interest will vanish once 2.0 is out. A top level project is probably more administrative work than simply resting in the comfort of the commons. What do other people think ? Luc > > -Rahul > > >> - robert >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
