On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have > not done that in this case. My original vote (+1) was partly for > consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell" > scenarios. I was swayed by Niall's argument and reflection on use cases > that I am aware of. I am sure Niall as well is open to enlightenment if > others can point to practical use cases (observed or likely) involving > [math] that demonstrate that the "pain-minimizing" alternative is to change > the package name.
Didn't someone say that math already had a "jar hell" situation encountered by users? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
