That's a very good idea IMO. On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > (apologies for jumping in half way through) > > luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes >> that have been done on >> [math] for the last months belong to the major changes with large >> incompatibilities with previous versions. >> We have already decided that the version number will be 2.0 to acknowledge >> that. I know of at least one big >> international research project that uses commons-math 1.2 and will switch to >> 2.0 when it will be published. >> They have already faced compatibility problems recently (two days ago). >> >> Should we change the top level package name from org.apache.commons.math to >> org.apache.commons.math2 ? > > why not org.apache.math ;-) > > maybe the time and interest levels are now right to consider a TLP... > > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardy...@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
