-1 IMO breaking compatibility should be decided on a case-by-case basis for components. For the widely used variety such as lang, logging, collections etc then I agree lets avoid jar-hell and not do it. But for other components that are not so widely used then such as Math I think its better to minimize the pain of upgrading for the user.
Niall On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: > > So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on > [math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2. > > [] +1 change the top level package name > [] 0 I don't care > [] -1 keep the old name > > Vote open for 72 hours (up to Friday May 19th 20h00 UTC) > > Luc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
