the top level package renaming seem rare in the current big java project. Binding the version to the package name is not a common strategy as well.
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Luc Maisonobe
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Ted Dunning
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Craig L Russell
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Luc Maisonobe
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Gilles Sadowski
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Luc Maisonobe
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Henri Yandell
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name James Carman
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Edward J. Yoon
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Bill Barker
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Jin Mingjian
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name James Carman
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Brent Worden
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Jörg Schaible
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name luc . maisonobe
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Dimitri Pourbaix
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Cyril Briquet
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name James Carman
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Cyril Briquet
- Re: [VOTE] [math] top-level package name Niall Pemberton