Every good meeting needs a conflict - a meeting about whether we should have the platform meeting would be a great meeting. If we are too large to actually have a meeting where something could be argued or decided, we probably don't need that meeting.
Status meetings are useful, but as was pointed out, reading the notes is a good way to get that status. So, in my mind, the question is - what kinds of topics/decisions/conflicts could we have in the platform meeting, which would make it entertaining and more useful to more people? We could certainly pick a "topics with > 20 e-mails in a thread on dev-platform" and have them as an agenda item to "resolve" during the call. Milan On 2013-04-25, at 11:59 AM, Doug Turner <doug.tur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lawrence Mandel wrote: >> However, I have had people tell me that they do get some value from this >> meeting. > > > > What value did they get and what role did they have at mozilla? I am > wondering if the audience for this meeting is no longer mozilla platform > engineers. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
