On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:07:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > Why this is all nice and true, I fail to see the point why the > > documentation absolutely needs to be on an APT source with debian.org in > > it. > > Because non-debianized stuff on debian boxes is evil :))
What do you call 'debianized' in this context? A Debian package? Something lying around on a Debian server? Something done by an offcial DD? Michael
