On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:03:20AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > By the way, doc-rfc is an example of a package in non-free which is > useful to some people. If a person is doing network development, they're > likely to need this documentation and [because someone doing network > development often needs to be disconnected from the stable internet] > having the documentation packaged and available locally would be useful.
Why this is all nice and true, I fail to see the point why the documentation absolutely needs to be on an APT source with debian.org in it. Michael
