On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:03:20AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > By the way, doc-rfc is an example of a package in non-free which is > > useful to some people. If a person is doing network development, they're > > likely to need this documentation and [because someone doing network > > development often needs to be disconnected from the stable internet] > > having the documentation packaged and available locally would be useful. > > Why this is all nice and true, I fail to see the point why the > documentation absolutely needs to be on an APT source with debian.org in > it.
Because non-debianized stuff on debian boxes is evil :)) And none official debian debianized stuff is not to be trusted. Friendly, Sven Luther
