> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:47:36PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > The right way to get rid of non-free is to replace each package in > > non-free in non-free with a free equivalent.
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:00:44PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Of course, the problem is that there are always more non-free packages > to be uploaded. When first I proposed the elimination of non-free, > there was much whining about Netscape. Now I hear much whining about > Japanese PDFs. This is bad, why? > Perhaps a logical place to start is, effective immediately, completely > and totally ban the introduction of any new package into non-free. And your basis for this is the document of which the DFSG is part of? Out of curiosity, what were your reasons for supporting a non-free package? -- Raul
