On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:39:13PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Just a datum point - I expect I'll now get lots of people contradicting > me but one package would be a start :)
No, this is perfect. The right way to get rid of non-free is to replace each package in non-free in non-free with a free equivalent. I know at least one person who would disaprove of that because it doesn't require any special vote. And, of course, I don't know if the replacement you proposed is completely viable. But I think you're on the right track. Thanks, -- Raul
