David Fokkema wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 03:19:24PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know. I just installed vrms and checked my system:TRB: What about Debian GNU/Linux, which by default does not install any non-free software?
RMS: Non-free programs are not officially considered "part of Debian",
but Debian does distribute them. The Debian web site describes non-free
programs, and their ftp server distributes them. That's why we don't
have links to their site on www.gnu.org.
GNU/LinEx is better because it does not distribute or recommend those
programs.
No non-free packages installed on sirius! rms would be proud.
Until we actually go ahead and move GFDL'ed manual's to non-free. Then, ironically, `virtual RMS' will complain that you have non-free FSF manuals installed! :-)
I wish RMS was as concerned about free documentation as he is about free
software.
Could you elaborate a bit on that? What's the problem with the GNU _Free_ Documentation License?
David
Don't judge a book by it's cover.
Stephen Touset
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
