On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 03:19:24PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > TRB: What about Debian GNU/Linux, which by default does not install any > > > non-free software? > > > > > > RMS: Non-free programs are not officially considered "part of Debian", > > > but Debian does distribute them. The Debian web site describes non-free > > > programs, and their ftp server distributes them. That's why we don't > > > have links to their site on www.gnu.org. > > > > > > GNU/LinEx is better because it does not distribute or recommend those > > > programs. > > > > I don't know. I just installed vrms and checked my system: > > > > No non-free packages installed on sirius! rms would be proud. > > Until we actually go ahead and move GFDL'ed manual's to non-free. > Then, ironically, `virtual RMS' will complain that you have non-free FSF > manuals installed! :-) > > I wish RMS was as concerned about free documentation as he is about free > software.
Could you elaborate a bit on that? What's the problem with the GNU _Free_ Documentation License? David -- Happy Birthday, Debian! August 16, 1993 http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/print/4959/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
