debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2002/02/08 Bug#133030: debian-policy: debconf policy (specification) implies dpkg will run .config before preinst ALWAYS Joey Hess
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
• 2002/02/08 Bug#133030: debian-policy: debconf policy (specification) implies dpkg will run .config before preinst ALWAYS Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Adam Heath
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/08 Re: dummy packages and lintian Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Adam Heath
• 2002/02/08 dummy packages and lintian Federico Di Gregorio
• 2002/02/08 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Joey Hess
• 2002/02/08 Re: Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant David Pashley
• 2002/02/07 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/07 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
• 2002/02/07 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/07 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/07 Re: Bug#132621: debian-policy: /etc/init.d _must_ be conffiles (not should) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/07 Re: Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/07 Re: Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant David Pashley
• 2002/02/07 Re: Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant David Pashley
• 2002/02/07 Re: Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant Joey Hess
• 2002/02/07 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
• 2002/02/07 Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant David Pashley
• 2002/02/07 Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Matthew Wilcox
• 2002/02/06 [����] ���� ����ȣ������ ���!! ��Ǫ����
• 2002/02/06 [����]�̻翪��� ��������Ʈ. �츮���̻�!! �츮���̻�
• 2002/02/06 Bug#132621: debian-policy: /etc/init.d _must_ be conffiles (not should) Josip Rodin
• 2002/02/06 Bug#132621: debian-policy: /etc/init.d _must_ be conffiles (not should) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/05 ����� �� ��ī�� ���ΰ��� �� �ֽ��ϴ�...(���α���) ����
• 2002/02/05 [홍보] 넣고 클릭만 하세요. 김경주
• 2002/02/05 It's a simple and easy-to-follow plan and EVERY website will want this service dollarmountain
• 2002/02/03 Re: New virtual package foomatic-data Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/02/03 Processed: retitle 123570 Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/02/03 New virtual package foomatic-data Manfred Wassmann
• 2002/02/02 Re: Policy being moved to docbook format Julian Gilbey
• 2002/02/01 Processed: your mail Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/02/01 Bug#131781: [ACCEPTED] Proposed virtual packages: audio-mixer and x-audio-mixer David B Harris
• 2002/02/01 Bug#131583: debian-policy: packaging-manual section 7.1 missing from policy Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/01 Policy being moved to docbook format Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/01/31 Re: Bug#131781: debian-policy: Proposed virtual packages: mixer and mixer-x Britton
• 2002/01/31 Bug#131781: debian-policy: Proposed virtual packages: mixer and mixer-x David B Harris
• 2002/01/31 Bug#131583: debian-policy: packaging-manual section 7.1 missing from policy Michael Bramer
• 2002/01/31 [홍보] 넣고 클릭만 하세요. 김경주
• 2002/01/30 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Adam Heath
• 2002/01/30 (����)���� ������Ʈ�Դϴ� �����
• 2002/01/30 Bug#131583: debian-policy: packaging-manual section 7.1 missing from policy Gergely Nagy
• 2002/01/30 Processed: Updating my email address Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/01/30 Re: VERY URGENT Richard Braakman
• 2002/01/29 Re: VERY URGENT Jim Penny
• 2002/01/29 [광고] 안녕하세요, 텐바이텐의 이창우 입니다. 10X10
• 2002/01/29 VERY URGENT ike jude
• 2002/01/29 Bug#131441: Confusion in acceptable package names Juan Cespedes
• 2002/01/28 InocuLAN detected the (Win32/Myparty.Worm) virus in Mailbox (Galb raith, Peter), Sender (debian-policy@lists.debian.org) !!! J05Alert
• 2002/01/28 new photos from my party! list
• 2002/01/27 new photos from my party! youngjae
• 2002/01/27 new photos from my party! youngjae
• 2002/01/27 [��������]��� �ٲٴ� dz������-�ְ�ȯ�� �ٹ̱�,������ ����Ȩ����
• 2002/01/24 [����] �鸸������ ��!! e-biz4you
• 2002/01/23 Best Source of Internet Traffic - Email 75,000,000 recipients for FREE Best Traffic Products
• 2002/01/22 Processed: Re: Bug#75508: marked as done (packaging-manual: a wrong example) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/01/22 Bug#75508: marked as done (packaging-manual: a wrong example) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/01/22 Bug#119559: Processed: reassign Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/01/22 Processed: reassign Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/01/21 Re: PAM/NSS Policy et al Sam Hartman
• 2002/01/20 1:1 ����� �帳�ϴ�(ȫ��) ���
• 2002/01/20 PAM/NSS Policy et al Jorge . Lehner
• 2002/01/20 ==== �߱����� �Ź��� ���� �߱��̺��δ� ====[����] �߱������Ź�
• 2002/01/18 Re: FHS vagueness on /opt Scott Dier
• 2002/01/18 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/01/18 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Colin Watson
• 2002/01/18 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/01/18 [����] ���ܿ��� ����! ���� �ٽ� �����Ͻʽÿ�. ���̷����ױ۸���
• 2002/01/17 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Branden Robinson
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/01/17 Re: FHS vagueness on /opt Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/01/17 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/01/17 Re: [kde] setting an /opt precedent Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Colin Walters
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Joerg Wendland
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Daniel Burrows
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Bas Zoetekouw
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/17 Re: FHS vagueness on /opt Gerhard Muntingh
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Joerg Wendland
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Gerhard Muntingh
• 2002/01/17 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Joerg Wendland
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Colin Walters
• 2002/01/16 FHS vagueness on /opt Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/01/16 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Martin Waitz
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Julian Gilbey
• 2002/01/16 Re: Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation Andrew Suffield
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/01/16 Re: Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/16 Summary of KDE filesystem discussion Jarno Elonen
• 2002/01/16 Adding debian/rules unpack as a required operation David Starner
• 2002/01/16 R&D framework funding A pocketfull of euros
• 2002/01/15 (����) �� ŷī,��ī�� ã������???????????????????? ������
• 2002/01/15 [홍보] 네티즌이 만든 검색엔진 아이따따따입니다. 아이따따따
• 2002/01/15 Bug#129375: debian-policy: typo/logic error in debconf spec Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/01/15 Oh for f**ks sake: Re: J.T. Sterlings Daily Special - January 15, 2002 Jon Kent
• 2002/01/15 J.T. Sterlings Daily Special - January 15, 2002 listadmin
• 2002/01/14 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Anthony Towns
• 2002/01/14 The most cost-effective marketing tool Direct email service
• 2002/01/14 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Adam Heath
• 2002/01/14 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/01/14 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Peter Moulder
• 2002/01/14 [홍보] 네티즌이 만든 검색엔진 아이따따따입니다. 아이따따따
• 2002/01/14 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/01/14 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Peter Moulder
• 2002/01/12 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Julian Gilbey
• 2002/01/12 ���̻� ����� �����ϴ�.. ����
• 2002/01/12 Bug#128734: debian-policy: criteria for Games/Puzzles is not precise enough Yann Dirson
• 2002/01/12 Bug#128868: debian-policy: Depends semantics unclear re circular depends Peter Moulder
• 2002/01/11 Re: Open Motif Joey Hess
• 2002/01/11 Bug#128734: debian-policy: criteria for Games/Puzzles is not precise enough Chris Waters
• 2002/01/11 Re: Open Motif Colin Watson
• 2002/01/11 Bug#128734: debian-policy: criteria for Games/Puzzles is not precise enough Yann Dirson
• 2002/01/10 20���� �����ϸ� 3330���� �ش�...�ְ��� ��Ʈ�� ���ֱ� fdfd
• 2002/01/09 [홍보] 넣고 클릭만 하세요. 김경주
• 2002/01/09 Processed: retitle Bug#122996 Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/01/09 dict-client virtual package name Bob Hilliard
• 2002/01/08 IPER1 para el comercio electronico Javier Ramirez Lopez
• 2002/01/08 Iper1 para el comercio electr�nico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/01/07 debian-policy님 안녕하십니까? 이프리콜
• 2002/01/07 Re: LSB Status Grant Bowman
• 2002/01/07 Re: (was Standards not Policy?) QA not Standards? Grant Bowman
• 2002/01/07 Re: LSB Status Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/01/07 Re: LSB Status Grant Bowman
• 2002/01/07 Re: LSB Status Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/01/06 Re: LSB Status Grant Bowman
• 2002/01/06 Re: LSB Status Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/01/06 Re: LSB Status Grant Bowman
• 2002/01/06 [���α���]1�� 2�� �ű� ���λ���Ʈ �����մϴ�.. bc��
• 2002/01/05 Bug#127809: reassigning Matthew Wilcox
• 2002/01/05 Processed: reassign Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/01/05 [판촉물,카렌다] debian-policy님 안녕하십니까? 기프트나라
• 2002/01/04 Re: Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/29 (was Online Help) Standards not Policy? Chris Tillman
• 2001/12/29 Re: Online Help Chris Tillman
• 2001/12/28 Re: Online Help Mark Brown
• 2001/12/28 Re: Online Help Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/28 Re: Online Help Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/12/28 Online Help Chris Tillman
• 2001/12/25 Re: Maintainer scripts chapter a hard read Joey Hess
• 2001/12/24 Re: The meaning of "must not modify" wrt. passwd, shadow etc. Steve Greenland
• 2001/12/24 Maintainer scripts chapter a hard read Ben Armstrong
• 2001/12/24 The meaning of "must not modify" wrt. passwd, shadow etc. Ben Armstrong
• 2001/12/24 Fuzzy explanation for cron.d scripts not handled by anacron Ben Armstrong
• 2001/12/21 Bug#126131: debian-policy: Errors in section 9.1 footnote 3 Ben Armstrong
• 2001/12/21 Re: Question about build dependencies. Junichi Uekawa
• 2001/12/20 Re: Question about build dependencies. Brian May
• 2001/12/20 Re: Question about build dependencies. Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/12/19 Re: Question about build dependencies. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/19 Re: Question about build dependencies. Adam Heath
• 2001/12/19 Re: Question about build dependencies. Adam Heath
• 2001/12/18 Re: design issues in debian packages Adam Heath
• 2001/12/18 Re: Question about build dependencies. Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/18 Re: Question about build dependencies. Colin Watson
• 2001/12/18 Re: Question about build dependencies. Bas Zoetekouw
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Gerhard Muntingh
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Joey Hess
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/17 Re: Question about build dependencies. Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/12/17 Question about build dependencies. Ola Lundqvist
• 2001/12/16 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Richard Braakman
• 2001/12/15 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/15 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Richard Braakman
• 2001/12/14 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/11 Bug#123570: debian-policy: Add new virtual package foomatic-data Manfred Wassmann
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Matthew Palmer
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/12/11 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Mark Brown
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Britton

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]